GedWPosts: 9,668

Off Topic
| Opinion: | No Opinion |
| Price: | 21.50 |
Interim sweetners...
Today 07:20
In each of the last few years PINN has released regulatory news in the weeks leading up to the Interim's announcement possibly during the week commencing 24 June. Will this year be any different? We know the BBC have some great musical festival and outside broadcast coverage which started over the Spring and continuing over the Summer months so PINN should soon announce if they have won any of those contracts. We should really hear soon what use the recent £2.3Mns fundraising has been put to.
RE: Opportunism or no smoke....
Tue 21:55
Should have gone to Specsavers G, there was only one sell at 21p and that was 20000. What is your point, what do you mean about balancing act? For the record I make it buys 75k sells 66k. So although a few sellers the buyers are snapping up the sells. Stop being such a Jeremiah or are you trying to talk the price down.
Opportunism or no smoke....
Tue 16:30
Whatever the merits of recent rhetoric the market in PINN shares may have been sppoked. 30k shares traded struck at 22.5p/share and a further 27.5K share trade struck at 21p/share so a nice balancing act?
RE: Re:matters for the AGM.
Tue 15:01
But why bother GedW? Do you know that the original post was made at 3.52am, so perhaps after a few pints of brave juice? Would also explain the caps lock and grammar issues.....
If someone confirmed to me that they did not have the £65 to start a small claims process against me when they feel they have an concrete case, I would not go out my way to sue them for defamation......
I would however, have the posts removed and on that point I think Pinnacle have let themselves down.
Re:matters for the AGM.
Tue 14:08
For sure corpse. But I would have thought those specifically named in the commentary could have a much stronger cause of action if the allegations are spurious and proved to have no foundation.
Matters for the AGM..
Tue 13:24
Or if without foundation as suggested by K1 using the same ruler. Then litigation to protect the to protect the companies reputation then clawed back through a Professional Indemnity Insurance if allowable.
RE: Matters for the AGM..
Tue 13:15
I have just read the comment at the bottom of the link you posted Ged. I think it's shocking:-
"This was written after speaking to numerous parties that have been financially ripped off by them"
It clearly should be "who have been". By the way your comma key isn't working again.
I'm sure that legitimate claims on Pinn are paid, however, if they weren't a small claims tribunal for up to £10000 would be the answer if they have any merit.
Managing cash flow for a company is not easy and suppliers can't be paid until pinn's debtors have settled. Classic problem for sme's doing work for large concerns is getting paid so all sme's are late with their payments.
Phone Alan yourself, I'm sure he'd love to chat about any concerns you may have instead of you adding fuel to the alleged problem by posting your innuendos for all to read.
Matters for the AGM..
Tue 12:11
There are obvious rumblings out there that things are not all ok with PINN why would anyone make up such serious allegations? The none or tardy payment of creditors allegations can be put to the Board at the AGM for clarification along with a request for confirmation of yearly sales staff turnover figures along with aged creditors position not just as at 30 September but for each of the 11 months up to 31 August all those matters can be raised in any other business at the AGM. These questions can be put to the Board in writing ahead of the AGM in order that the Board are not put on the spot but have been put on notice that these questions will be put to it for clarification. It is my opinion that the Board in the face of such serious and on-going allegations should address them by making a public announcement in the usual way rather than just ignore them.
RE: Re:Re:Load Of Boll
Tue 11:38
The Board are very aware of this poster.
Lets be sensible here, IF this was a reputable recruitment agency with a legitimate claim, then they would have been paid or taken Pinnacle to court. They haven't and this is well over a year ago.....
Would they then post (in capitals for effect I assume) on public forums criticising one of their clients? Very foolish in my view.
People seem to forget that you cannot just write whatever the hell you like on a public forum.
Re;Re::re; Load of Boll
Tue 11:29
That will never happen, but larger corporations have been caught red faced with facebook and twitter and they are a communications company. So six of one or half a dozen of the other, then we have Mr Ratner and his jewel.