Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter




PHE Share Chat - RSS Feed

Powerhouse Ener Share Chat (PHE)



Share Price: 1.15Bid: 1.05Ask: 1.25Change: 0.00 (0.00%)No Movement on Powerhouse Ener
Spread: 0.20Spread as %: 19.05%Open: 1.125High: 1.15Low: 1.125Yesterday’s Close: 1.15


Share Discussion for Powerhouse Ener (PHE)


Thread ViewThread View
Please Login or Register to post messages
Posts per page:


Stumbler
Posts: 1,162
Answer
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.15
View Thread (2)
RE: £54 million in losses!?
Mon 11:03
I don't know Hillgrove's financial position, but if their support of the Company enables them to acquire shares at a low price, it seems to me unlikely that they would sell any before the Company had reached it's full potential - if ever. Hopefully, further development will be based on loans, either direct to the Company, or through Hillgrove. I see nothing to entice them to enter a Credit Swap Agreement, where they could be liable to pay surcharges on their 1/2p. conversion price.
I do not know whether the accounts have been published as I don't have the patience to troll through all the numerous sources available. With fairly low annual outgoings, ! should think that the accumulated loss is in a large part due to the cost of Pyromex having been written off. These losses are saleable in the event of a wind up or do mean that £54M profit can be made before corporation tax becomes due - check it out?
 
SprogBarnes
Posts: 1
Observation
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.13
View Thread (2)
£54 million in losses!?
Mon 01:17
A couple of thoughts -

Given the new road map it looks like money from Hillgrove will be used to build multiple G3 units, build a large scale facility and potentially acquire a waste site or two. As such, could the recent dilution of the convertible loan be down to the fact that Hillgrove aim to sell shares to fund these investments and a rising share price at half the cost (0.01> 0.005) will mean they can afford to invest more into the business without it costing them real money? Thus benefiting the share holder and themselves as they should then be holding an increased stake at and increased price. A win win.

AFC saw a phenomenal turnaround following a financial deal that left shareholder feeling short changed and confused, but now that deal is paying the monthly overheads and then some. Let's hope this dilution is a long term play to generate finances off an increased share price which would benefit us PIs as well as the big guys.

The proposed global plans sound exciting and expensive so to continue to have the business floated makes sense in my opinion. I have a descent stake here that I'm down on right now so I could be clutching at straws but the business plans are exciting I only wish communications were better.

Lastly, the latest RNS suggests £54 million in losses to date...any idea what that's all about and how there's so little show for it?
quindell
Posts: 1,518
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.15
LOL!
Fri 14:56
Someone decided to make a £50 + fees loss on their failed day trade!
vxrandall
Posts: 2,462
Premium Chat Member
Off Topic
Opinion:Strong Buy
Price:1.15
clearly we've
Fri 11:48
taken a little hit because;
- people probably expected to hear about the commissioning by end of June
- people saw the change in terms for ongoing debt financing (1p convertible to 0.5p convertible) and are concerned about the dilution
thats fair enough....though i can't imagine Bond/Hillgrove would be wasting their time with this just to made a quick turn given its pretty small beer compared to his wider empire.
there is clearly a larger strategic plan here and news of commissioning will get the needle moving back in the +ve
nice opportunity to top up at low prices in meantime
kenny100
Posts: 10,209
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.15
JUST AN OBSERVATION
Fri 11:34
Notice were on the riser board...............................
kenny100
Posts: 10,209
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.15
KAMEL17
Fri 11:30
Wondered when you may of popped in. Trust your well. I see your playing chess................
intermevan
Posts: 906
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.15
View Thread (4)
RE: To all
Fri 10:53
lol Antelope - don't bite mate, Kamel loves to stir things..d'oh - I've just bitten.

Have a great weeken folks ;)
antelope
Posts: 367
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.15
View Thread (4)
RE: To all
Fri 10:51
Kamel. It was not an attempt to belittle. It was a simple statement of fact. I did not understand the post, and the reason I did not understand it was largely because it lacked any punctuation.

And whilst it may be a less common form, and may be more appropriate to a historic rather than recent event, 'I didn't understand what you wrote' is acceptable grammar.

And please stop being so damn pompous.
Boo80
Posts: 158
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
KAMEL17
Fri 06:57
Hi KAMEL17 thanks I could tell you was sticking up for me thanks GLA
KAMEL17
Posts: 628
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (4)
RE: To all
Thu 18:00
Boo80,

You will no doubt see if you read my post that i was actually sticking up for you as the sentiment of your post was sound. It may not have been too easy on the eye,however, I understood it well enough.

You had made a good contribution and antelope tried to belittle you with his pedantic criticism of your punctuation. This was why i had responded in the way I did -it was most definetly not a dig at you and if i have inadvertently caused you any offence, I apologise as it was never my intention to do so.

keep posting





Sign up for Live Prices


Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.