Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

Early Stage Investment Opportunities: SyndicateRoom, investing from idea to IPO. Watch here

Share Views Episode 9 - Early Stage Investment Opportunities


Oxus Gold PLC Share Chat (OXS)


OXS Share Chat
OXS Share Chat
OXS Level 2 Console
OXS Level 2 Console
OXS Live Share Price
OXS Live Share Price
Buy OXS Shares
Buy OXS Shares
Add OXS to Watchlist
Add OXS to Watchlist
Add OXS to Alert
Add OXS to Alert
Close Info Alerts is a Premium Feature
Login or start your FREE trial today.
Add OXS to myTerminal
Add OXS to myTerminal

Oxus Gold PLC shares appear to be de-listed or suspended.


Share Discussion for Oxus Gold PLC


Thread View

Please login or register to post a message on Share Chat.

Posts per page:


Shwmae
Posts: 2,570
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
RE: Rns
14 Sep '16
So what does this mean guys for shareholders? Had an RNS Alert this morning as well but no link to info!! What was that all about?
 
wraith
Posts: 4,321
Observation
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
Sdbernard
14 Sep '16
Thanks to guys on ADVFN for views, & to yourself for posting link.

BDO link brought forwards:
https://www.bdo.co.uk/en-gb/oxus-gold-plc

BW
Sdbernard
Posts: 578
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
RE: Rns
14 Sep '16
There was a meeting yesterday. Loads of chat on advfn

http://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/london/oxus-gold-OXS/share-chat
Insidertrading
Posts: 1,067
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
Rns
14 Sep '16
Got an alert warning this morning..then can't find an Rns?
HotShot69
Posts: 1,074
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
RE: Karimov suffers stroke
2 Sep '16
.. and he's gone. Will the world miss him?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-37253028
Nobull
Posts: 308
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
Shinyshiny
1 Sep '16
Thanks. Sorry, I can't guarantee to be able to read everything - indeed, I couldn't read anything to do with OXS for more than a year. There is no point in me posting until I have read all the documents I should have:
Insolvency Law - the relevant Acts of Parliament to estimate the right level of fear I should have about the administrators running the show what with their £500 per hour business costs, and about what duties, if any, they have to the residual risk takers (us?), and how they can be made, if at all, to balance the interests of the different creditor types;
French Law on the grounds for overturning arbitral awards (Les recours contre les sentences arbitrales?);
All the examples of successful overturnings of Uncitral awards in France (annulations de sentences arbitrales) where France was the siege d'arbitrage; (I know a little about the Tapie case against Credit Lyonais)
Studying the Tapie case is to restore my psychological well being as well as to learn a lot of useful French business and legal language (the highs and lows of the Tapie case are so extreme there seem to be no parallels in our Anglo Saxon world (or maybe I am just ignorant about similar cases here?): he had ambitions to be president of France, he was a media star, he had friends in high places on both the left and right of politics, he was made bankrupt, he spent time in prison and then after bankruptcy he was awarded 400+ millions of Euros in an arbitration award, only for it to be ordered to be paid back by the cour d'appel and later by the cour de cassation (Supreme Court?);
Read our arbitral award (i.e. the bits I have not wanted to read) and see whether it violates le principe de contradiction or un ordre public.
Work out why two French speaking "QC or High Court Judge" equivalents, both with distinguished careers, would make a ruling that apparently breaks French law;
Discard my theories that don't stand up to scrutiny by other people attending the meeting on 12/9/16 (i.e. RW, Pug, Nick2412, et al.

An interesting Youtube video is here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmZg8bBLMAo
where you see a re-enactment of un coursier (a motorcycle courier is the cultural equivalent here?) deliver an arbitral award to Tapie's lawyers' office (61 Rue de Miromesnil) take place in the first few minutes, where the commentator explains about the lawyer turning straight to relevant page to read about the award of 400m euros or whatever. The highs and lows of Bernard Tapie seem more extreme than anything I have suffered so, and I am greatly encouraged by any meeting organised by any of the staff of Oxus, even if there is nothing they can technically do at present to rectify the injustice we seem to have suffered (some recognition of contributory fault by the Uzbeks to the failure of the financing without any corresponding compensation being awarded surely must be a violation of le principe de contradiction, but WDIK?
Shinyshiny
Posts: 266
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
Karimov suffers stroke
30 Aug '16
Shinyshiny
Posts: 266
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
RE: tel999
29 Aug '16
Good to see you back Nobull.
Nobull
Posts: 308
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
tel999
21 Aug '16
At a guess, it might mean the Uzbeks aren't even paying Calunius, the litgation funders, any of the award because the Uzbeks want to deduct the $10m debt they allege Oxus owes them off the Award first. i.e. there is not going to be any payout to any creditors, even to Calunius (who are ahead of us shareholders in the payout queue), unless a new much larger award is obtained. Am not a lawyer or insolvency practitioner, but that is my reading of it. The prescribed part must be something that the administrators have to do by law as part of the administration process, I wonder?
tel999
Posts: 1
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.00
RE: Latest Bdo info
21 Aug '16
Item 8 Prospect for creditors.... Reads
Under Section 176A of the Insolvency Act 1986, where after 15 September 2003 a company has granted to a creditor a floating charge a proportion of the net property of the company must be made available purely for the unsecured creditors. The Company has not granted a floating charge to any creditor after 15 September 2003 and consequently there will be no prescribed part in this administration. Except to the extent that the Company is successful in obtaining a partial annulment of the arbitration decision and subsequently obtains a significantly larger award in a further arbitration, there is no prospect of funds becoming available for distribution to the Company’s preferential and unsecured creditors, or shareholders.

The last sentence states " there is no prospect of funds becoming available to unsecured creditors or share holders"

Is that legal or am I reading it wrong?




Share Price, Share Chat, Stock Market news at lse.co.uk
FREE Member Services
- Setup a personalised Watchlist and Virtual Portfolio.
- Gain access to LIVE real-time Regulatory News (RNS).
- View more Trades, Directors' Deals, and Broker Ratings.
Share Price, Share Chat, Stock Market news at lse.co.uk






Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.