Have been here awhile myself, don't mind the waiting, was hoping to be celebrating a decent size win by 17 December (my birthday) 2015,..... but then I recall having similar thoughts around this time last year!!!
The UN, Arbitration House, Gravy Train Street, Euromillions Land
Dear Mr Mobile, Thank you for your letter dated 28, 9, 15 which we have sent off for due diligence at Upper Hierachy House, which must be cross-referenced and back dated accordingly to comply with strict rules (Paragrapch 3, subsection 3C, Conformity and Compliance in Present Day Letters).
Having vetted your prose for potential sub judicial illegalities while looking for portents of a libellous nature, we can safely confirm that your concerns will be investigated with the utmost alacrity and diligence by our staff.
Having taken into account all that you say in the aforementioned missive, we, unfortunately fail to see salience in any of the alleged misappropriations regarding the UNCITRAL procedural Calendar and system.
The travails of our staff are Paramount, and whilst there may be some legitimacy (Qualified by precedent, which you fail to specify ) in your grievances, I can vouch for all our staff , in that they ae most very very happy on the lengthy journey their gravy train takes them.
I understand that the final hearing of this case took place in April/May 2014. We are now approaching December 2015, over 18 months later, yet still the decision of the arbiters has not been published. How can it be possible that 3 people over the course of 18 months have been unable to decide the outcome of this case? It is absurd.
I am aware that the proceedings are secret. Why, by the way, is this so? Please excuse the clichés but they do both apply to this case:
1) justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done; and 2) justice delayed is justice denied
There seems (to me) to be no valid reason why these proceedings - the final hearing at least - needed to be held in secret. It is unfathomable to me why the arbiters have as yet been able to reach a decision. They must, by now, have forgotten much of the evidence they heard back in April 2014.
Please can you explain to me why the decision has not yet been published?
Will let you know it I get a reply. Might take 18 months, and will no doubt quote confidentiality clauses. We can but try.
This share is beginning to bore the ******* life out of me.
I think the only claim to infallibility is on the part of the guy who squats in the Vatican and wears a pointy hat. To be fair to the bloke he seems genuinely concerned about the poor, it' the fat bureaucrats and hangers on around the organisation that really pi** me off. Anyway enough of that.
C'mon Pierre, it's long past time gerra move on man.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.