If you register with law360 using the link above, then underneath the summary of the arbitral tribunals judgement are direct links to 2 pdf documents on the law360 site ; the full 400 page Final Award and also Lalondes Dissenting Opinion.
I'm more concerned about possible payments to the majority panel members, from one of the most corrupt regimes in the world. The strength of argument in the dissenting opinion cannot simply have been ignored.
I wonder who polices the integrity of the UNCITRAL arbitration process. I'm sure that some independent must scrutinize cases when dissenting opinions arise.
There was clearly no skeleton in the cupboard for Oxus, and Mr Shead & co have clearly not done anything wrong.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.