Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter


Share Views: The Cyber Security opportunity.
What you need to know.


Lloyds Share Chat (LLOY)



Share Price: 58.86Bid: 58.86Ask: 58.87Change: 0.00 (0.00%)No Movement on Lloyds Grp.
Spread: 0.01Spread as %: 0.02%Open: 57.78High: 59.18Low: 57.58Yesterday’s Close: 58.86


Share Discussion for Lloyds


Thread View

Please login or register to post a message on Share Chat.

Posts per page:


M1k3y
Posts: 1,112
Observation
Opinion:Hold
Price:58.86
RE: Off subject
Tue 22:22
It just goes to dhow what a mess the tax system is in , that it has created the ability for companies to be able to do it in the first place.
A simpler tax system for all, would be much fairer, although of course, you will never be able to completely stop people and corporations trying to avoid paying it.
 
mick-b
Posts: 467
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:58.86
RE: Off subject
Tue 22:21
Yes that's correct. No real HQ in the true sense of what is normally expected. A legal mythical HQ that renders them
Stateless under Irish law.
Interestingly Obama protests against the EU tax demand. Fearful that should it be paid to Ireland, Apple will be able to
reduce their US worldwide tax bill. Ireland doesn't want the tax as it's dependance on other large multi-nationals could be damaged. No wonder the public are confused....
Hope this helps....
Cheers
HeresHopin
Posts: 455
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:58.86
RE: Off subject
Tue 21:19
On the radio it was mentioned that Apple diverts it's profits from these operations to a head office based in NO country. I can sympathise with basing operations in a particular country but basing this particular head office in no actual state (and so pay no tax) If this is correct, that is surely wrong.
fleccy
Posts: 1,251
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:58.86
RE: Off subject
Tue 20:47
Comparison with the Exon Valdez:
"Exxon's actions were deemed "worse than negligent but less than malicious."[46] The punitive damages were further reduced to an amount of $507.5 million.[47] The Court's ruling was that maritime punitive damages should not exceed the compensatory damages,[47] supported by a peculiar precedent dating back from 1818.[48] Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy has decried the ruling as "another in a line of cases where this Supreme Court has misconstrued congressional intent to benefit large corporations."[49]

Exxon's official position was that punitive damages greater than $25 million were not justified because the spill resulted from an accident, and because Exxon spent an estimated $2 billion cleaning up the spill and a further $1 billion to settle related civil and criminal charges. Attorneys for the plaintiffs contended that Exxon bore responsibility for the accident because the company "put a drunk in charge of a tanker in Prince William Sound."[50]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Valdez_oil_spill
fleccy
Posts: 1,251
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:58.86
View Thread (3)
Off subject
Tue 20:37
The Apple back tax issue is interesting. Apple is the biggest company in the world by Market cap and might be faced with a 13 billion Euro tax bill and the Americans are screaming. Don't get me wrong, I know that BP and Volkswagen are different situations but the debacle in the US over the Volkswagen emissions scandal is estimated to be costing $15 billion and Volkswagen have set aside $18 billion in total. BP have agreed a settlement with the US government of $20.8 billion. The total cost to BP is $61.8bn, I believe. I think the US officials should wind there necks in. if it had been the U.S., dealing with a European company, no doubt they would have slapped them with a huge fine to boot.
Newchurch
Posts: 313
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:58.86
Well...
Tue 20:32
...once again, nearly at b/e point after holding just a couple years short of a decade.

Still, I guess, IF we keep getting a 2p p.a after tax dividend, in around thirty years, then the shares will have paid for themselves.

May buy a decent headstone I guess if Labour hasn't re nationalised it all by then.

W.o.W to come I fear
checkricky
Posts: 298
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:58.86
59p 59p 59p
Tue 20:13
I think the poster meant 59p or was it 69p would not mind a bit of that lol
JHenderson
Posts: 757
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:58.86
49p - 49p - 49p
Tue 20:09
Has anyone seen 49p? We were told it's nailed on after Divi date.

49p, hello, calling 49p.......come in 49p !!
mick-b
Posts: 467
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:59.00
TheMeanMachine
Tue 14:46
Your guess on Friday's US jobs seems to be on the money.
A big hit on Commodities ...so maybe some leakage on jobs report OR markets are expecting good figures.
CEY is falling rapidly.
Strange that the dollar index shows no real strength today.
Wise to leave commodities I think in case of further fallout post jobs reports.
Cheers
whatamess
Posts: 89
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:58.94
Almost there, ready to book my trip
Tue 14:44
If this share does what it supposed to do, ie reach pre brexit levels I'm off to buenos Aires to my lover for three months. 70 pence




Share Price, Share Chat, Stock Market news at lse.co.uk
FREE Member Services
- Setup a personalised Watchlist and Virtual Portfolio.
- Gain access to LIVE real-time Regulatory News (RNS).
- View more Trades, Directors' Deals, and Broker Ratings.
Share Price, Share Chat, Stock Market news at lse.co.uk






Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.