In that case then, if they hadn't completed the required tests, this really is a poor show and would demonstrate really poor management not to mention financial wastage - I can't believe that would be the case? surely not?
Pretty normal for focus groups, they only want to hear about what supports their theory and tend to suppress anything which does not support them. Whilst they loudly proclaim that fraccing is undemocratic, at the same time, they introduce Orwellian principles into their own activities
Antis Not Happy with Results of OH Fracking Study They Funded Researchers from the University of Cincinnati have been studying fracking and its potential affects on water wells in five Ohio counties for the past three years. The lead researcher, Dr. Amy Townsend-Small, shared the results at a recent meeting of the anti-drilling Carroll Concerned Citizens. She said, “The good news is that our study did not document that fracking was directly linked to water contamination.” Oh oh. That’s NOT good news for antis–and frankly, they didn’t like her telling them the truth of what her study found. Townsend-Small also said this, “I’m really sad to say this but some of our funders, the groups that had given us funding in the past, were a little disappointed in our results.” You can be sure that any future funding for studies Townsend-Small wants to make, at least from radical environmentalists, will be nonexistent. She had the temerity to tell the truth–to the people who hired her to not tell the truth. That takes courage…
Indeed, it would have been totally bonkers (even for IGas standards) to go through the permit and planning application process without doing a proper site evaluation in the form of 3D surveys. They've obviously messed up,
Are you saying then that igas just packed up and left due to a few protesters? Cause if that's the case, that's a very poor show for a company that should be pressing on with testing, gaining public support via better education and engaging government to give them the authority to just do the job.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.