Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

Member Info for thistle


Member Since: Mon, 11th Oct 2010

Number of Share Chat Posts (all time): 13,513
Number of Share Chat Posts (last 30 days): 0

Last Posted: 14 Sep '14



14 Sep '14


Chasing a bit of skirt? How does that work? Please enlighten me? Lol do you cut a bit off skirt off?..throw it as far as you can, then run after it?..is that a Southern game?...lol ..
9 Sep '14


has your ship not come in yet! Dry Docks again eh! Hope you are getting all this sunshine, be interesting to see which way the vote goes...top of the league?..no chance but 2nd atm, but a long way to go yet ! take care and atb
7 Sep '14


Britain has for the first time waded in to BP’s legal battle over payouts for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, saying US court rulings against the energy group raise “grave international comity concerns”.

In a filing to the US Supreme Court, the UK government said BP had “gone to great lengths to restore the gulf coast”, but was being forced to pay large sums to individuals and businesses who were not affected by the spill.

It warned that the courts’ treatment of BP undermined confidence in fairly resolving disputes in the US and the “trust necessary for international commerce”.

The UK’s arguments have been echoed in filings from business groups, warning that rulings against BP could hurt businesses and consumers and make the US a less attractive place to invest.

The intervention comes on the heels of protests from France over an $8.9bn fine levied against BNP, the French bank, which fuelled European concerns about US “extraterritoriality”, or the principle of US authorities extending their reach to foreign companies.

The BP filings, known as “amicus briefs”, are intended to help persuade the Supreme Court to hear a case that could limit the compensation that BP is forced to pay.
6 Sep '14


Judge Carl Barbier of Louisiana’s Eastern District issued his FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN PHASE ONE TRIAL. The 150+ page document suggests that punitive damages may be appropriate as Plaintiff’s argument for same is “not without merit” according to Barbier. But, 5th Circuit precedent may preclude same.

http://tampa.legalexaminer.com/toxic-substances/bp-trial-judge-barbier-issues-findings-of-fact-and-conclusions-of-law-in-phase-one-trial/


Sign up for Live Prices
Top Recommended
Hot Chat Topics
Top recommended posters in the last 30 days
Share Price SpacerQPP1000950 
Share Price Spaceronceatrader528 
Share Price SpacerBrotherhumble523 
Share Price Spacermatlot494 
Share Price Spacerakcsl469 
Share Price Spacersortapundit445 
Share Price SpacerSammyC439 
Share Price Spacercautioussid420 




Member Login

Forgotten your password?
Email:

Password:


Don't have an account? Click here to Register Free!


Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.