Member Info for Pale_Rider
Member Since: Sat, 23rd Jun 2012
Number of Share Chat Posts (all time): 433
Number of Share Chat Posts (last 30 days): 0
Last Posted: 16 Jan '13
Number of Share Chat Posts (all time): 433
Number of Share Chat Posts (last 30 days): 0
Last Posted: 16 Jan '13
16 Jan '13
Also it might have been someone who showed support for the fake. And if he was behind the Shri9 fake id he may have other id's on here as well.
16 Jan '13
I agree with that sentiment.
My main concern though is the culprit who faked a well known poster's id to benefit financially. He was someone who wanted Scancell to go down in price and SAR to go up. That someone could very well be a poster here. It would have to be a poster who had traded out of SCLP and moved into SAR.
This is the post that he put on SAR:
"The mood music has changed rapidly, I am all in here now, onward & upward. Good luck folks, this years Scancell."
16 Jan '13
We have to bear in mind that were are talking about SCIB2 which at that time was in animal studies. SCIB1, Scancell's lead vaccine has never been used with an adjuvant. Presumably Nottingham Uni had enough Homspera for research purposes so basically it was a concern for the future. Shri9 would have realized that.
16 Jan '13
Shri9 is well researched in Scancell. He would have known that Scancell had also considered evaluating an alternative adjuvant with a Canadian company so it was not the end of the world.
http://innovacorp.ca/news/immunovaccine-technologies-partners-scancell-advance-dna-vaccine-delivery
16 Jan '13
If it was the case that Lucinda was in the wrong why did Admin remove only the fake Shri9 (SHRII9)?
