InterQuest Group Share Price (ITQ)

What a shower of s**ts, they're trying to do it again, whatever they can do to feather their own nests.

Gary Ashworth, Clare Ashworth, Chris Eldridge and David Bygrave. These are the kinds of people you want to avoid in life. They are a disgrace. Pulling the rug from beneath shareholders, acting like this offer was a charitable one in an attempt to take the business private. The set up of Chisbridge by these parasites and the events that have followed it illustrate the dirty tactics some will employ to make a fortune. It's been good to see the Independent Director David Higgins against this resolution from the start, echoing Panmure Gordon's statement that this was not in shareholder interests. http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=ITQ&ArticleCode=ksi8yeqo&ArticleHeadline=Response_to_unsolicited_Offer_by_Chisbridge_Ltd http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=ITQ&ArticleCode=licq1q86&ArticleHeadline=Response_to_Defence_Document What happened to the 20% who wrote to announce their rejection of the offer? River and Mercantile Asset Management LLP - 2,800,000 Livingbridge VC LLP - 2,250,789 Mole Valley Asset Management Limited - 710,400 Elderstreet Investments Limited - 410,000 Hazell Carr Edwards FURB 400,000 Castlefield Investment Partners LLP - 291,475 Tim Fleetwood - 279,387 Blankstone Sington Limited - 222,207 Charlotte Fleetwood - 109,541 Daniel Goldblum - 29,800 Tsippi Goldblum - 45,200

Now that's a big shock, they've actually appointed a new adviser, thought they were going to the dirty on us all. Still going on about taking the company private, its quite simple, increase your miserly offer and then more people may sell !!

There is a blog post on interquest and government policy here: hTTps://www.sharesoc.org/blog/regulations-and-law/sophos-interquest-government-policy/ It looks at the struggles of AIM company investors and ShareSoc look to respond having met with the head of AIM on Tuesday, we'll shortly be submitting a response to their discussion paper: hTTp://www.londonstockexchange.com/companies-and-advisors/aim/advisers/aim-notices/aim-discussion-paper-july-2017.pdf. Our response seeks to address many of the issues raised.

I agree. Thing is, Chisbridge will now be snapping up as much as they can at an even lower price. Talk about manipulating the situation for your own gains!! Should be illegal.