nm27 Jun 2020 19:30
Still can't get to grips with basics?
." it is shown as a trade but there isn't necessity for the exchange to be backed by £ transaction."
Your comment.
Feel free to give examples of O trades [meaning T2 settlement] not being settled for cash. That's my evidence - LSE reported trades with types. Can't think of any better unless you are asserting its being incorrectly reported ?? That's the only way out of your pickle
[Hint too stop digging yourself into a bigger Walter Mitty hole - we all know Acacia had to meet a payment to Link 2 days after this trade so it maybe just a trade as reported]
CF is referring to the remaining balance they held.
TR - see Markshares post
Orph broker on the case - LMAO - its an ordinary trade FFS - what are they going to do??
I think the onus is on you to show the trade is incorrect - good luck.
I think most can lift the Honest John posting veil.
V poor show -esp as you said you were taking a break - yea, sure. Motives