88 Energy Share Price (88E)

Mikee76

How much credibility does a company still have after the flow test RNS debacle

Fair point everyone should weigh the credibility of all the posters here, as I have always said, judge by the content, not the posters anonymous handle

Onwards and upwards from here, placing out the way and plenty of newsflow to look forward to with the promise of being fully funded for the next 12 months minimum :))

Taxi

Information and informed opinion is not your enemy, or malicious intent

Consider what happens when investors trade on misinformation, such as the mega hype cycle of 2021

All the average investors get robbed, by a few sharks.

Think on what you and others might have done if FOMO created by misinformation had taken over, would you have averaged up like the agenda driven rampers were pushing

It may be better to sit here with less shares at a lower price, and weigh the options coldly

Poor and incomplete flow results, a company the polishes the turd to the extreme, with ~29b shares and a stated intent to consider a consolidation

IMO they will push hard for it, as it is illiquid on the ASX, where trade moves, at a SP of .003c for the average investor are

up 25% or down 33% to meet the market.

Olderwiser, you are an anonymous person on chat board. Investors should really listen to the official line from the company. At least they know who that person is and what their agenda is. Its up to them to decide if want to invest off that info. No one knows who you or Scot are or what your agenda is so why would anyone listen to you.

Handspringguy 00:03

I agree 88e are talking positive, as they always have, but on credibility

Who should you believe, the people that have been proven correct, and continued to stay on the facts, despite the abuse

Or

The people that printed fully funded, then raised capital at a 40% discount the next day, if memory serves correctly