LONDON, Aug 3 (Reuters) - State-controlled Royal Ban
k of Scotland said on Friday it has dismissed employees over an interest rate rigging scandal, but gave no indication of whether it would reach a settlement soon with investigating authorities.
Reporting a drop in first-half operating profit, RBS said it was co-operating with governments and regulators which are investigating the role of a number of banks in the setting of Libor and other inter-bank lending rates.
'The Libor situation is a stark reminder of the damage that individual wrongdoing and inadequate systems and controls can have in terms of financial and reputational impact,' Chief Executive Stephen Hester said.
RBS said it was being investigated by regulators in the United States, Britain and Japan and by competition authorities in Europe, the United States and Canada. However, it was not possible to measure reliably what effect the inquiries would have, including the timing and amount of fines or settlements.
'I think that the regulators must decide how they want to deal with the situation,' Hester told reporters on a conference call. He added that he believed the Libor issue had been a result of 'wrongdoing by individuals' rather than a 'systemic problem' within the industry.
The announcement marked the first time RBS has confirmed it fired staff for misconduct in the Libor scandal, which has already cost Barclays chief Bob Diamond his job.
RBS has declined to name the dismissed staff. However sources with knowledge of the matter said last month that RBS had fired four traders. They said Tan Chi Min, Paul White, Neil Danziger and investment adviser Andrew Hamilton were sacked at the end of last year. None was available for comment.
New details from court documents and sources suggest that groups of traders working at three major European banks, including RBS were heavily involved.
Tan, the former head of delta trading for RBS in Singapore, was fired in November for allegedly trying to influence the banks' rate setters improperly. He is suing RBS for unfair dismissal, alleging the practice of traders providing input to rate setters was widely known among senior managers at the bank.
Rival Barclays was fined $453 million last month by U.S. and UK regulators after staff reported false interbank rates - the interest charged when banks lend to each other - that were above or below the real rates. Rates reported by a panel of banks are used to calculate Libor.
Thomson Reuters Corp is the British Bankers' Association's official agent for the daily calculation and publishing of Libor.
HESTER UNDER PRESSURE
The Libor scandal has heaped pressure on Hester, who was appointed CEO four years ago to rebuild the bank and its reputation following a bailout in 2008.
RBS, which is 82 percent-owned by the government, reported a first-half operating profit of 1.83 billion pounds ($2.8 billion), down from 1.97 billion in the same period last year. The bank made a statutory pretax loss of 1.5 billion pounds, which included a 2.9 billion pounds accounting loss due to a rise in the value of its own debt.
Shares in RBS were up 4.6 percent to 213.8 pence at 1000GMT, with the Stoxx Europe 600 banking sector index up 3.1 percent.
'We see this set of numbers as in line with expectations. With recent negative headlines, this may generate some amount of relief in the stock,' said analysts at Nomura.
Oriel Securities analyst Mike Trippitt said potential litigation charges and sanctions by regulators were 'significant investment distractions'.
'Until concerns over litigation risk (interest rate swaps) and regulatory sanction (Libor) have been comprehensively resolved, we retain a hold recommendation,' he said.
RBS said it had set aside a further 135 million pounds to compensate customers mis-sold loan insurance, taking its total provision so far to 1.3 billion pounds. It also set aside 50 million pound for claims by small firms wrongly mis-sold interest rate hedging products, a provision which Hester admitted could rise higher.
Britain's banks are facing a bill running into billions of pounds to address claims of mis-selling various financial products.
RBS also said it had taken a 125 million-pound hit from costs arising from a computer systems failure in June which prevented customers using their accounts, and could face additional costs when the full scale of the disruption becomes clear.
Regulators in Britain and Ireland were looking into the incident and RBS could face legal claims from customers affected by the glitch which resulted in payments not being processed properly. The bank has initiated an independent review into the fiasco and will publish its findings, Hester said.
The bank also said on Friday the planned flotation of its insurance arm, Direct Line, was on track and planned for October this year. However, Hester told reporters there was flexibility to delay it if market conditions were prohibitive.
'We have flexibility in the timetables so if market conditions are not right we have the ability to wait,' he said.
Direct Line has emerged as a target for private equity groups but Finance Director Bruce Van Saun said he believed an IPO offered better value than an outright sale.
British government sources told Reuters on Thursday that it had no plans to nationalise RBS fully, contradicting a report in the Financial Times.
($1=0.6444 British pounds)
(Additional reporting by Steve Slater; Editing by Greg Mahlich, David Stamp, Anna Willard) Keywords: RBS EARNINGS/
COPYRIGHT Copyright Thomson Reuters 2012. All rights reserved. The copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters News Content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NETbuilder and Interactive Data.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk!
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.