Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I Spoke too soon
Looks like the new energy sector is being part funded by the old oil and gas industry perhaps we should pat ourselves on the back eco warriors and didn’t know it. As long as I make a few bob I can live with that.
Hi Frac, that's why I love a webcast or an AGM. You see the body language or when someone is really interested. You could see that it had alerted LK's political sniffer dog reaction. That will be filed for a later programme. 'Over-ambitious' is political speak for 'we got it wrong' or 'we won't get it past the public'. Labour will do the same regarding 2030. I'm sending off missives about the NEW 9X (2X onshore, 3X solar, 4X offshore).
This is interesting: https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeen-aberdeenshire/6440359/peterhead-windfarm-approved/
In the last auction that got anywhere (AR4) the strike price for floating offshore was £87.30 against plain offshore £37.35. The subsidy or strike price needed for the Peterhead windfarm isn't mentioned in the article. We know offshore has shot up so there won't be any surprises when the numbers required are published and the amount of 'revenue support' which is paid by all of us.
Brent seems to be reversing some of the losses made last week.
Everyone waiting patiently for Buybacks to start lol
Thanks, Therapist, I’d missed that when Mod posted it. It is reassuring to know EnQuest has direct and high quality input into OEUK, and now mainly from the smaller companies operating in the UKCS. ( Brindex seems to have become fairly non-consequential.)
R , seems Lk’s statement on SNP politically misforcasting their targets is a set up for Labour next year … as we all know you can’t magic said#s of turbines and panels in 5 years !! Empty rhetoric that’s being stored rotting to be thrown once Labour are in the stocks !
Hi Therapist, had posted that on the 16th of April, 16:38, but bis repetita placent.
Hope the censorship comitee approves.
Hi,
I thought Steve was formidable on the latest FY results presentation. Now been sent in to play with the big boys. Politic in action.
https://oeuk.org.uk/oeuk-strengthens-board-with-three-new-appointments/
GLAXXX
Hit a rich vein there Tigar.
Hi Redbuffet
With respect please stop posting your drivel about others not posting anything of value to you? your posts or of no value to this BB either.
Thanks all for the suggestions of using filter. Have employed to good effect. I had resisted hithertonow in the hope that some of the dross posters could at some stage have shared some insight but I’m drawing a line in the sand. @Stevo12 if you post analysis on twitter make sure you share your handle!
I watched Kuenssberg again. I missed so much.
The subtitle was “Is saving the Planet going out of fashion”
Chris Stark says the “choretics” have changed which required google assistance but did say regarding the energy transition “Ed talks about it, Starmer not so much”.
Layla Moran of the Lib-Dems produces a letter from a 7 year old supporting her point
Labour has cut £28bn from green budget but kept all policies in place.
The SNP set a target that was purposefully over ambitious according to Claire Coutinho which elicited the reply from LK “so for political reasons they set a target they were never going to hit” (SNP missed 8 out of 12 targets)
“Grotesque profits made by our energy, oil and gas companies – renewables so much cheaper” said Packham. He is a busy boy. He was dressing up in Bath the previous day. https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/chris-packham-massive-bath-extinction-9236443
Shabana Mahmood - Labour upgrading Ports – definitely part of their plans. Clean power by 2030 all models say money will come from private investment and Labour will take steps to unlock private sector investment. Confirmed that gas is a strategic reserve and then repeated a simple mnemonic saying that in the meanwhile you can X2 onshore wind, X3 solar power and X4 offshore by 2030. She then swerved commenting on the ECHR decision backing a group of old Swiss ladies on climate concerns. She is giving a talk on justice tonight which might explain her appearance. Still doesn’t explain Ed’s absence if climate is so important. Seems like Labour are trying to change the conversation.
Luke Johnson spoke sense but was out of his depth in political terms. Explains why top businessmen avoid these things. You can't win as Linda Cook found out at the Audit Committee in July 2022.
I never saw any comments at the time but I wonder if Chris Stark resigned the CCC in January because of the waning political support. He is still a young ambitious guy and best to leave and change career at the top. All he said was that in election year it felt time to go. Perhaps he read the runes and that politics is far different when in power to when in opposition.
Where's Ed?
Wyr are you on here then don't bother
Onedb completed agree as there was always going to be a back test, especially with the pull back with Brent over recent weeks.
It’s looking very good indeed and 18-19p would be a good target in the next few weeks.
Be interesting to see what buybacks do to the SP. Worth considering that HBR didn't rise in response.
Very good chance we'll see 21p or higher in my view, just might take a little while. I've held my shares.
Its good to see the 200 simple moving average starting to slope upwards again . Usually a pretty good show of trend strength. LIke it or not its the consensus over 200 days and its now pointing up .
Https://twitter.com/ShabanaMahmood/status/1782020339431551204
I looked at the latest Labour postings on 'X' and they did mention yesterdays Kuenssberg programme on BBC. From a programme largely about climate change they attacked the Tories on the rule of law and ignored the climate aspect. The Labour party is fully aware of the importance of social media and none of the postings are accidental. They aren't left to a junior to decide what goes up and all posts will be run past a senior advisor. It also follows that anything that might not help Labour's cause doesn't get posted. It is a weathervane.
Ed never commented.
I was just thinking the same (so we're probably wrong ;)
Possibly the buybacks have started. I expect a TR1 very soon
Couldn't agree more NSTA - I got out of Enquest in 2022 but kept an eye one them. Having got back in two weeks ago I started looking on here again - same posters with same dreary banal guff about anything but Enquest interspersed with the odd post of relevance
That would have been good news when we were reliant on cheap energy.
Not sure if this'll get past the self-appointed censors as deemed off topic but it revolves around buybacks. Some of us do talk away from this board and I have the other investors permission to post (he thinks that calling this board a "four-ale bar" overrates us and kindergarten is more accurate; plus he doesn't drink).
What if timing is of little consequence? Guesswork from here but who is to say it has to be done in the market. The stock market is and always will be a popularity contest. It does mean the most deserving don't always win. An Off-book trade will relate to the market price but is the natural home for large trades. If the buyer is already lined up then as long as they haven't been seen to getting stock at a ridiculously cheap price then who could complain? For the buyer a lower price is preferred obviously. Ahah, one of you sharper ball-bearings will say "but EnQuest is the buyer".
But didn't Craig say they were discussing cancelling or placing in Treasury? If M&A is about a cheap 5% share block is surely a good bargaining tool. In fact I'd go further. It might be the best way of filching 5% of liquidity at the bottom of the market. Could the 5% be part of the jigsaw? AB doesn't think short-term.
Energean up 3.5% and they've got an FPSO moored about 60 miles from Israel. About the same distance from Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the South.
NST and redbuff maybe don't understand politics is our biggest problem we all face, nothing to do with what the company does it all boils down to loonies in Parliament.
If it wasn't for them we'd have already forgotten about the nasty hangover caused by our 60p party and I'd be sitting somewhere hot and not busting my balls at work in this freezing workshop.
Apparently these clouds are man made now by chem trails