London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Seems they like to shout their news from the rooftops. http://openx.com/press-releases/openx-ranks-1-web-mobile-app-inventory-quality-worlds-largest-programmatic-market/ looking at Pixalate R1 page I see Divx is listed along side reel. Have I forgotten a business tie up between Divx and Blinkx ?
My daughter works for the US cosmetics company and they absolutely never use traditiional advertising, it's all social media and promotions - right now they've taken over the Hispaniola for a few months. What's interesting is that the targeting is such that unless you are likely to be interested you'll never have heard of them; I suppose that's the strength of influencer advertising, it has an exclusivity that can't be achieved by the broadbrush approach.
What impresses me is the reach score Rhythmone are achieving. Alongside the increading comscore stats. Lets hope they can monitise this traffic and along with the cost cutting start to show a profit.
All rather impressive.
Dan as good as his word. An impressive re-entry into the pixalate rankings. Now they need to crack the mobile in-app rankings as well Here's the link to the pixalate site. http://www.pixalate.com/sellertrustindex/global/#!global
And they value it as less than a start up. Something HAS to change. And when it does I think it will be RAPID.
From iii March 2016 Rhythmone was ranked #7 in US and #1 in International -YES #1. April 2016 Rhythmone is ranked #5 in US (up 2 places since last month) and now #2 in Internationally (down 1 place but equal total score with the new #1).
sorry. www.rhythminfluence.com
Brandy as in brands! new website rhythminfluencer.com Cool.
Some familiar themes there, maybe... http://finance.yahoo.com/news/viex-sends-open-letter-yume-120000614.html
http://corp.kaltura.com/Video-Solutions/Video-Cloud-Platform R1 using these
"Both Citi and Numis have already moved from -$3m for f/y 17 to neutral. These are not full notes hence no reported change.." Thanks Shroder, is that forecast EBITDA?
Why do you think next week is going to change anything., the figures are mostly known, depends how much is revealed about the hidden figures. Of more interest is projections. I don't expect any significant impact on thr sp, unless the new is unexpectedly bad, which I don't think it will be. I'm coming round to thinking that Tosca have dropped one with this, they don't always get it right and it barely scratches their asset fund. What they intend to do with it remains a mystery.
Most results are in. Anyone clever enough to take a stab at a read across to Blinkx. As far as I can see, even the loss makers less cash are still being given enterprise value in the high tens of millions. How tosca and/or shorts/hedge funds are allowed to control our book/SP for so long is beyond me. Roll on next week and an end to this false market.
blinkx.com as gone missing today https://www.quantcast.com/blinkx.com
STTsbumbag, thanks for that. I was wondering.
rustybucket the auctions at midday only started a few weeks back so your not going mad
Ok I have learnt something. Never realised there was an auction every day at 12.00. On every share ?? As for trading is dead its gone down another more than 20% since the forecast so not that dead. Just wonder how low it can go.
Seems the only template we can use for a bid coming from Tosca is the InternetQ one which they paid about four and half times the market low price which equates to a bid price for blinkx at about 72p plus while many long-term holders will be pretty peed off with that price anyone that's got in over the last year so or more likely bite your hand off that price and come to think of it quite a few long-term holders were also be happy with that just so they can move on
It is perfectly normal. There is an auction everyday at 12 noon. Trading is dead as Blinkx recently told the market roughly what to expect in terms of figures for the full year results coming next week.
Whatever is going on here is not normal. I have ( NEVER ) seen UTs in the middle of the day with virtually no trading. Then all of a sudden, I believe yesterday about 3.40 miraculously trades came from nowhere taking it to 15.5 and then back up. Now, that for me isn't proper trading. Until we get a level of trading that is realistic it is fair game for anyone. London79 said he had a trade sitting there that took 2 weeks to be traded. That doesn't seem to me to be a fair market. But unfortunately it is where we are at.
Schroder I partially agree with you but with a very large retail shareholder list personal financial interest often overtakes long term value considerations which an institutional holder would consider and this give rise to anomaly a bidder here can exploit
re your statement below. That said to be technical about it, a takeover bid is not subject to shareholder approval, it is based on how many shareholders accept an offer made to them. That in my language is shareholder approval. I have been involved in a number where it has been rejected, some where its been approved, and some where it has even gone compulsory and they have bought my shares regardless. I wouldn't accept less than £1. But saying that if they got the relevant percentage they can compulsory purchase them. We are ( in my opinion ) a million miles away from that scenario. And if someone was to offer to buy, who is to say someone else wouldn't enter the fray and launch a counter bid. Speculation speculation speculation. I prefer fact. Unfortunately ( or fortunately ) very busy at work and they have refused ( for the second time running ) a holiday request. Would have loved to have gone and put some questions to the board. One day.
Rusty Couldn't agree more about the need for clarity and plain speak next week. That said to be technical about it, a takeover bid is not subject to shareholder approval, it is based on how many shareholders accept an offer made to them. Sure if the board wants to be super awkward and not recommend a deal or grant diligence access they can push the bidder to hostile territory but how many shareholders would support the board in not agreeing a deal at a decent premium to the current price. i.e I am talking about shareholder psychology rather than due process. Let's do a straw poll. What would we we each sell for. Based on today, my starter for 10 is that I would only sell at above 40p. Very interested in peoples' sentiments.