London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Yet one poster claims it was a good rns and its a strong buy.I would hate to see what happened if it was a bad rns.
Evening cash. Normal service resumed. Just twice as bad.
The trading volume on this platform which is the MAIN platform for this share shows 1 trade of £35.05 today and 1 of £100 yesterday and that is a FACT.If you dispute the figures take it up with lse as they have provided them .That also is a FACT
Soon clear. Final results due in next month or so. Interesting to see how the interest payments have effected cash burn.
lets be clear about this. Misleading is posting a factually incorrect statement such as Manas coal being too radioactive to sell, or quoting trading volumes that are factually incorrect. I disagree with hundreds of posts on here but very few are misleading. Infantile, yes, but not misleading. To accuse someone of that is to accuse them of a possible crime (see FCA box above) and MUST be supported by evidence. If no evidence is presented, this must be dealt with in the strongest possible manner.
Leed is contributing A$1.2 million of funding towards a 4 year, A$3.25 million secured convertible note financing being issued by Battalion. The note has a 12% coupon for first two years, followed by two years at 14%, if not converted · Battalion's major shareholders are contributing to the convertible note alongside Leed · The convertible note benefits from a first ranking general security agreement provided by HM · HM has generated monthly revenues of between A$1.2 million and A$1.5 million over last 6 months from which the interest can be comfortably serviced. The note is convertible into equity which would result in Leed holding up to 15% of Battalion, equating to an equity interest of 11% of HM · If Leed converts its notes into equity, the conversion price will be at a 25% discount to the price at which Battalion acquired control of HM earlier in 2014 and at a multiple of approximately 1.4 times the current base case 2015 EBITDA HM forecast
The investment will increase in value. The only downside is the increase in value does not generate extra revenue to pay the bills. Only when the investment is sold the profit and cash is generated. I will say no more on the subject as you seem very knowledgeable on the subject.
The investment will increase in value. The only downside is the increase in value does not generate extra revenue to pay the bills. Only when the investment is sold the profit and cash is generated. I will say no more on the subject as you seem very knowledgeable on the subject.
how the increased expenditure of HM has an effect on LDP. We lent them money, get a payment, and have the option to convert to equity on favourable terms in the future should we so wish. If HM spend an extra AS10m this year we will not have to spend a penny more. The lack of understanding here is breathtaking. As for more trips to Australia, thats got to be the most laughable comment ever on here. (takes some doing). The deal is done, no further input required. Percentage rolls in every year, as equity goes up in value. Please could someone tell me what LDPs additional costs are. There are none.
Page of the ft our big buyer is back today with a £35 buy wow stake building going on here .
any future increase in value that Leed get is through conversion to equity of their loan note in HM, at a 25% discount to the price paid by Battalion earlier in the year. As the value of HM raises due to increased profits so does Leeds investment value increase. This investment is AS$1.2m . If they converted half to equity at an increased value (further discounted by their favourable agreement) they would have more than sufficient to re invest and expand elsewhere. Protected against any increase in costs, but able to reap the benefits of expansion. Thats what I call a great deal.
Almost forgot as the investment grows it will surely mean more trips to Australia to see how things are doing and trips for a few people to Australia do not come cheap.
I agree with you 100%
Directors get pay rises as we all know. There may well be additions to the board. The amounts involved may be small but if our income is fixed for a year or two then cash burn will increase. I'm sure you will let me have your case against this.
I do not know why I bother trying to explain things. Nice to know you understand the basic rules of income and expenditure. I'm sure Notts will give me reply to tell me I am talking rubbish but do I care. The only way forward for lead would be a takeover of the limestone company. If sales and profits are going to be as big as some on here say then that is the way forward.
That apparently is when the share price will rise. Absolutely excellent news maybe by then we will have rebuilt the great wall of china with our large wall panels.
Really? If the expenses of Battalion increase, how does that effect our loan note? If their profitability increases, so does their value, and our loan note option to convert to equity rises in value. How would Leeds expenses increase due to the expansion of Battalions business?
Taste have you not yet learned you are wasting your time mate.
What he meant was . the business grows and so do the outgoings . sure, the profit ( hopefully) increases . but the profits are not enough to fund any further investments . I strongly suggest you read before making hasty replies. .
Leed are not an ordinary company selling to the public. They are an investment company no more. Their costs will inevitably increase their profits will not. The current investment returns 12% no more no less. Explain to everyone how profits will increase more than expenses if the income coming in is fixed?
"aren't we all glad to hear that". Glad to see you feel you have the right to comment for us all. No further comment required.
Morning taste it is as exciting as ever here I see.One poster reckons share price will stay a this level till 2017 aren't we all so glad to hear that :)
"As the company grows its expenses will also increase and so does the rate of cash spent" AS indeed does the profit, hence the cash position becomes even stronger. No contradiction to my earlier post, merely a reinforcement of my sentiments. Are posters here really trying to say that expansion has only negative effects on the business? Give me strength.
And as I said before given the volume in this stock over the last year and general market sentiment they might well find it difficult getting a placement off the ground.