Agreement on, as a united mutual group of pi we improve our chance of successful outcome. IMHO the need for confirmation of basic valid factual information is the minimum that shareholders need. The doubt is not of our making or just fear, Production Z&L ? Production copper? Plant & eqp. ? Money raised last 12months ? Three officers depart ? Copper JVA still ongoing ? Kabwe is in Zambia. Yes we have some solid information. How can BOD not see that pi have rights to be informed of a clear factual position of their investment. Good or bad news pi need & demand to be told.
Ascot are still mentioned within the processing of Lead.Zinc section. My mention of the RNS side was an aside comment to content within the website. What has been issued by RNS remains within the Stock Exchange archives I imagine. They would need to have a regulated news service released to make necessary amendments if required. I would have thought that if there were any it should have been done already.
I concur with most of what you said - again I reiterate - united is a force to be reckoned with, divided we are almost useless.
It seems BMR Watch's untimely demise has stirred some discussion. I have emailed the instigators (where I have their addresses) and some large holders who have pooled their shares. This is simply to discuss options.
This is also the time for you eternal optimists to re-consider and jump on board. I genuinely believe you will be happy that you did.
Is it really such a bad thing having a shareholder alliance?
Bryn Most of ref. to Ascot on BMR website is deleted, I do not mean RNS material. Ascot have links on their website,which used to link to BMR website,now shows error message say not available or similar words.
Have you any info, on if any reports were issued by Metanza & Mintek, I believe they were doing testing on the leach plant tailings, can you ask BMR RW if they received any reports from Metanza & Mintek.
Assaying All samples extracted by drilling are being sent to the SGS assaying centre in South Africa for verification. The final resource statement will thereafter be compiled by The Mineral Corporation and the Pre-Feasibility Study on the beneficiation plant will be concluded by Metanza.
23 November 2011
Processing and Production
The Phase One high grade washplant slimes section of the stockpiles is capable of immediate sale to processors. BMR has already received detailed off-take tenders for this material which can be lifted and exported at a rate of 5,400 tons per month, commencing in September 2010.
Leading South African metals processing company Metanza and international consultants Mintek have been instructed to prepare verification mineralogical and metallurgical testwork to estimate the recovery of zinc and lead from the Phase Two resources. Detailed testwork was first conducted by the Zambian State mining company ZCCM in 1988.
Metanza will then proceed to specify the flotation process best suited to maximise recoveries of the leach residues and estimate capital and operating costs for the establishment of a processing plant. It is currently estimated that, processing at a rate of 60,000 tons per month the plant will have an 11-year mine life producing a standard 55% zinc concentrate.
I have said before - as a united front it would mean the officials need only answer a single source which has the powerful backing of more than 10% of shareholdings. The easiest and probably cheapest way is to do as they have already suggested they will do by communicating information via the website as in the E-COMMS link in an earlier post.
To be fair, I am not sure who updates the website so not sure whether it is full time staff member or a part time/ad-hoc worker.
All I have requested is that they delete any misinformation and leave what is correct on the site. I know LJC used to be able to compare and check changes to websites so if anything happens I am sure he will be kind enough to share.
As for the content of RNS - they cannot alter that - they would need to issue an amended RNS I believe.
Brynjon Laffer LK Fsstback any pi, please take the chance to seek confirmation.
Pi could pool their holding & as a group request the BOD give fundamental information on assets via RNS, website or meeting, any form that gives all shareholders the information & available at the same time & causes least distraction to BMR. The thoughts that should make that possible, 1, We are suspended,not market timing sensitive. 2, investigation is ongoing?, as long as release has no negative impact on investigation or or any possible action that may be pending. 3, BOD give reasons why it cannot be done, we will some knowledge to see if,reasonable & a anchor point. 4, BOD are not cooperative & not willing to hold dialogue thus avoid accountability. I hope BOD are open to dialogue & not number 4, if number 4 is the outcome...then we have to fight for protection.
PI will need to provide proof of holding,can it be sent directly to BMR, if & when minimum threshold is passed, a statement can be issued to BMR BOD, obo of pi group, that then allows the BOD to confirm what the pi group has agreed to request. This format may remove any concern some pi may have about handing information or power to other pi. This could be done by pi emailing BMR watch,their holding & name plus emailing BMR IR . The information can be correlated & we then wait to see if minimum threshold is passed. That format should allow BMR BOD not be distracted,investor relations or nomad could confirm holding details are factual & update when threshold has been reached. No control sought or given, all we need is consensus & agreement from pi on wording of request. Lets see what response we get before any contact is made with BMR BOD, to find their view.
Laffer, any thoughts, I do not want to start making assumptions & yesterday I checked with my broker H&L, they are able to supply proof of holding, no charge,I will action request when ever it is required.
The real question is can BMR process the WPS and the other tailings profitably. The former does not appear to be a problem. I , for whats it's worth have asked several officers in the company about the latter and have received positive answers. Many will be cynical of this but we are no longer dealing with MA but a far more hard nosed management. If the company was to wound up I think it would have been done by now.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.