Regards RW, I only stated 'living up to his reputation' as less than impressive reviews are in the main what you get from different people. I have spoken only briefly with him and he just seemed to have very little to help fill me in with any queries I had, just a few staple sentences that he must use on a continuous basis.
The fact he didn't apologise shows that he has little common decency, either that or he is deliberately avoiding answering simple investor queries and behaving in awkward manner to rile investors.
With great respect I recall many posts from you in the past confirming positive conversations with the late unlamented moronic MA. Why are you to be believed re conversations with AB. Why should he confide in you?
DD ask yourself why they are finalising the testing which I have been told by RW is nearing completion if this was going to go down the pan. I don't think ABwould have taken the task on if he thought bmr had no future. He's a very busy man much in demand . He confirmed to me when I spoke with him that he was going to move this company forward. GLA
Morning David, well its the last trading day of November, so lets see if that "within the next month" statement from the 6 October RNS transpires into news today!! Now we have new management, sticking to a timeline would be a good start. An update of some description would most welcome considering the "no mans land" we find ourselves in due to suspension. BMR's and shareholder future is now completely in the hands of AB, imho I believe a lot is going on in the background. Looking forward to a positive outcome here for all and sundry.
I have no personnel view of RW, but to make a statement which imho he new to be untrue, I said to him I have seen rns released when company have been under suspension & because I was not 100% sure. I retracted what I had said, I said clearly I am not 100% sure of what I stated, I want to check it out & come back to you. He did not contact me & say I made a mistake. He only said he got it wrong when I phoned again,very matter of fact & normal. No apology, he said I was the only one to speak to them ref, AGM.
Razor has requested us to relax, will comply Razor but please give us a factual reason that can be verified.
Please, no more secret network, I heard it on the grape vine, no proof, where did info. came from or any guarantee it is true.
Why not say if they are planning or trying to sort a date for AGM, Stuee is saying he has been told it will be held, will not say who has told him or when the AGM will be held. Yet any one with alleged information via the secret network will not say any more than "I know more than you, AGM will be held & BMR will be ok.
Suspension is acting as a shield against too much panic, suspension is also providing cover for BOD & management.
If you have nothing to hide then release some information,work not finished, issue update giving giving time frame when you hope to be in possession of the facts & detail you are working on.
When a office holder or employee of a entity starts repeating things you believe you have been told again & again. You start to think why are they repeating the same " working hard & quickly, DFS we are wanting to increase the rate of return & will able to produce" I hope it is true. Then give shareholders some facts, when, plus some numbers & where is the money coming from. As long as it has no impact on the instigation,why no update on DFS(by end of next month from rns).
Good positive DFS news comes tomorrow, EXCELLENT.
Suspension lifted with clear explanation & factual details. EXCELLENT.
I did not ask a single question about the DFS, the beatification plant or finance. it should be released to all shareholders at the same time. I said I hope you have noticed I have
You were either fobbed off by Robert, or he doesn't know the rules. Either of which is pretty poor for someone in his position, and not at all helpful for any concerned investor. To be fair, the longer this drags out without any news whatsoever, it does feel as though something is wrong, not just an oversight in the recording of information regarding the monetary anomaly.
I hope not, but surely if it were merely a case of only accounting for a discrepancy, it would have been done and dusted by now and we would have heard. I wonder, just how many accountants and lawyers does it really take to change this BMR light bulb?
News tomorrow, or next week perhaps. It seems about time eh?
Undermind by a larger concern? Wishfull thinking, it looks self inflicted. Believe DH has a lot to answer for. If you look at his other Directorship you can see how he could of possibley taken advantage and milked deals/purchases. MA relied on him to much perhaps only to be let down or did he just turn a blind eye?
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.