We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
I did follow it with a question mark!
come on suzy you have had enough time , it’s time to update your shareholders on the current situation with 201 and theoremrx no more bull**** just an honest appraisal of where we stand i believe that’s the least we deserve .
Nobody in their right mind is buying shares in this dog.
I have no intention of putting any money in Val at any price.
Cheap shot at Sareum by the way.
Obviously based on bitterness and anger!
Dracula, if you reply was to me..
Then, no I'm not invested anymore, I was a few years back when I bought in after it rose from 1.5p to 3p and caught my attention, I bought up to 7p and missed the 66p high, convinced it was a tree shake, started selling around 56p all the way down .
Did very well out of it. Kept some for another year and sold the majority of my portfolio to fund buying a house.
I'm not going to argue with you.
I'm simply saying the FCA have no power here and most shares.
You can go on their website if you like , it's very easy to contact them, as I've done it. That's how I know the FCA have no power .
It's AIM though, the purpose is to fund companies by listing and dilution is inevitable.
Not justifying it, but anyone can pick 50 aim shares and find none in overall profit 5 years later.
I've rooted for long term holder here ever since I sold.
Hope they do something to return some value, but after all this time I struggle to see how their ever going to do anything with 201
This has been a disaster thus far and I have sent several emails to suzy ,she replied to some around Christmas but none in the last 4mths (understandable given the abuse/complaints she and Kevin (rightly !!) Got
However the companies that have de listed thus far are cash guzzling bio techs (burning £10mln+ per year ) and have achieved nothing...AND have unscrupulous II and BOD who pull the rug as they own often 40%+
In VALs case it is the shareholders who own more than the mgmt hence the successful EGM
For all VALs faults too start a discussion with de listing is poor form
'Release' ..
No delisting, she's on holiday and doesn't give a hoot now she's been shown the door. They have had a board meeting by now with the newbies I would guess. No doubt we will have an RNS early next week. They need to realise the quarterly update.
The broker has fairly large clients at 6p they will not let them lose money imo and will push as much as possible as they need business from them.
No reason to do so plus would have to be approved by shareholders and we don't have any II. Enough cash until next year.
The desperation to buy in cheaper whilst trying to force people to sell is a bit sad.
I always assume that the brokers will know what's happening before any of us do
Surely if a delisting was imminent, nobody would be able to sell any of their shares. I've just tried a dummy sell on Int Inv for 5000 shares and I was offered 3.56p which is a slight improvement on what I was offered at 8am
I would think SAR is almost certain to be delisted given how low the market cap vs actual spend and requirements for cash.
Valirx has potential with a very modest cash burn. It takes time to find top quality compounds which they have done and now just a bit of work before it is ready for a deal at the preclinical stage. We just need one. CLX is our best hope with the Imperial compound.
The fact the merger work is still ongoing since October then that means it is highly likely to be successful as you don't fail after 6 months of work. If that completes it likely means a much higher market cap and more cash and any rise will be very significant in the medium term.
Although I have no real reference other than similar situations like this, its a delisting im most concerned about. Considering selling up at 75% loss to be fair and at least recovering something.
The silence is concerning.
This company seems to have gone dormant whilst a replacement (good luck with that!) is found for the current incumbent. I do wonder whether there are other plans being drawn up as the major shareholders can't be happy with the status quo.
Looks like the Thx deal was a bad idea and seems to have come to nothing. That needs clarification without further delay.
I did also mention a Government Financial Authority. Do you mean that there Isn't any?. Are you Invested In Valirx?. If so Do you not care that Valirx Is financed by diluting It's SHs?. Please show where their not? Please show me where Valirx succeeded In attracting Finance except In one case earlier years where they received a grant?. Feel free to correct me . AIMO
Are ValiRx authorised by the FCA?
Because if not there's not a thing they can do about it.
Hello Grainger14. No wonder New and established Companies are leaving the LSE. If the UK Government want to retain a Stock Market of any calibre they need to start taking things more seriously. Valirx has been from the start financed by the dilution of It's SHs year after year. What type of concerned Government Financial Authority would entertain such carry on IF they wanted to maintain proper controls. When Valirx diluted It's SHs for the Second time,
Which I and many more were In the last 125 for1 Share consolidation. The First was for 125/1 also. The FCA should have made the BOD responsible and organized a wind up of the Co and compensated all LTSHS that didn't trade the Co. Any UK Government can expect nothing else only keep loosing good companies until they take control and ACT. AIMO.
So how long does it take the FCA to investigate a company. This seems to be like everything else in the uk, nobody wants to point the finger at corruption...vaccines/banks/pharm/post office/nhs/tories....they all just ignore us and hope we will go away. Meanwhile the rich get richer and the rest of us can go get *******
...those who are asking how our reps are getting on...enforced silence....strict aim rules....Looks like we've unwittingly played straight into Suzy and the BODs hands.....strikes me all the enforcement is on investors...not the buggers who should be under the limelight.
.....for years... single sourced contract/agreement? and nothing .....I repeat nothing... what is the relationship between the two parties involved? ...the whole thing stinks!...and it would appear someone's gone to ground .....absolute long stop 'end of last financial year'....Is Suzy sulking or hiding?.....I wonder!
I've just picked up this comment on the Internet..
"Welcome to the AIM cesspit where all you need to succeed as a CEO or chairman is to be corrupt to the core"
There's a fine line between incompetence and corruption.....especially pharma......An explanation is still outstanding as to why val 201 has not been delivered by the "drop dead" date... 4th April 2025...
...good morning...just watched va interviewed on bbc 1....wishy-washy....strikes me top nhs bosses need a rocket up their ****s ....another of our brilliant nhs crews ....managed by incompetent politicians/sm's ....who have no respect for data. we need to step back and admit "hearts and minds" must include fear for job security....for those who are clearly incompetent. i repeat...........those leeches are sucking valirx dry....i'm convinced suzy is taking us to admin in order to pick up the lab (and all its contracts) for a song...just remember my words "black cat"....i'm warning you all to be on your guard unless this incompetent gang of rouges actually do have something of value to share with us.....when it suits them of course, definitely not when it suits us.
Those leeches are sucking valirx dry....I'm convinced Suzy is taking us to admin in order to pick up the lab (and all its contracts) for a song...just remember my words "BLACK CAT"....I'm warning you all to be on your guard unless this incompetent gang of rouges actually do have something of value to share with us.....when it suits them of course, definitely not when it suits us.
When the F are we going to dismiss Suzy and Kevin can't come quick enough they both should not be allowed to take another wage from the company
"It's dead jim" is the correct header lol