Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Anyone wanting to keep track of the Court Case can do so on the Link below. You will not get absolute detail on it - you would have to stump up a Registration fee for that ..... but its enough for to keep track of how the Court Case is going in, You just get access to the last few events / moves / documents in the case, so make sure you have a peek every week or so else some entries will appear and drop out of sight before you see them. https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/8780972/Dynamic_Digital_Depth_Research_PTY_LTD_v_LG_Electronics_Inc_et_al Keep expectations in check is a slow-ol-business ..... :) ..... personally I can live without the fine details, the entries on screen are enough to keep up to speed on the Court "progress". Progress is a relative term here - the wheels of Justice move exceeding slowly in this type of case rofl, as each and every minute detail and procedure, is contested, argued, and tossed around. We still have not yet reached the main substance of the case, despite the filing being circa 18 months ago :)
Share Sales for DDD Group are now every 3 months via one outlet. That means "normal" Market Dynamics will not come into play in the same way as Stock Market Traded Shares, nor do they respond to Hype. The price will only move as a result of the last matched bargin. (every 3 months), and for a long while, the "price" will bare no relation to future Market Possibilities in anything like a timely manner, only to the last purchase and there will be few of those. By in large Traders have now got out, leaving holders for a genuine long term. If the Court Case against LG succeeds, all bets are off, and the price anyone will be asked to pay will jump massively. Other than that, existing Holders need to batten down the hatches for the Long Run, or get out at a loss - thats if anyone will buy them in the Quarterly Market, because they will now not respond to Market Hype, only to reality after the fact. In the latter case, no one will sell if the Case succeeds unless they are demented or need the cash, and if it doesnt succeed, they will in effect be worthless for a year or two at least. I personally think DDD Group are a good Company and worth holding long term; but no-one should even dream of short term share movements unless the Court Case succeeds. Shares will only trade on a Matched basis, not in response to Hype.
Aye, for sure, because SmartCam et al is not in the Frame for the Court Case. The Court Case does however have a Major Impact on DDD, and Apple are not going near DDD until this gets resolved, they are in no rush - else they would have bought into SmartCam already.(thats if its their intent). Hopefully the Court Case gets sorted out in the next few weeks, and clears the decks, as the saying goes.
Hmmmm indeed :) Well spotted - I had a peek ..... that article goes on to report : "The feature will not, however, be available at launch but will rather be provided as an update later on." No question ..... "2+2 could equal 5" (as the saying goes) with this one...... ...... but, if it was ..... then Apple couldn't use it until the current DDD Case clear's Court. Speculation ?? - that's for sure, no question - but its definitely worth a "Hmmmmmm" ..... :)
Good spot shylock. Further encouragement!
Many thanks for your help, I will get in touch with them.
Hi All, I have a small amount of shares in DDD, I thought I had lost the entire value until reading this board, forgive me as I am not a big share investor but to trade my shares now do I need to get the certificate back from my existing broker ? Or can they trade with Asst Match on my behalf ? Thank you in advance for your help. Regards.
What a difference a month makes! If the pending court case rules in favour of DDD - then where to next?
Refreshing transformation of the website....................visit www.dddgroupplc.com
Good morning guys, Cameron and Osborne aside for a moment, I thought it worthwhile posting on here. I represent a firm called Asset Match who Shylock very kindly referred to in an earlier thread. We are managing an aftermarket for DDD Group post AIM, so should anyone wish to get involved on the trading side, simply keep track of the price and/or keep up to date with developments at the company, then you can do so by registering on our platform. It's free to register and will literally take you 30 seconds. As some of you alluded to earlier, you will have undoubtedly noticed that the share price came off dramatically when DDD initially announced they wanted to come off market but sadly that's just the nature of the beast. Does that mean that the shares should be worth c.-80% simply because AIM has served it's purpose.....absolutely not. Market makers pull the price and seemingly everyone wants out simply because most institutions won't hold onto unlisted stock coupled with the fact that investors see the last days of trading as the only opportunity to cash out. Essentially that's why we exist; to provide liquidity in private company shares. Along with DDD Group, we manage a trading facility for six other firms who also chose to delist from AIM and the ISDX. The other fifteen odd companies we look after are made up of private companies who either do not need to raise cash so can't see the point in listing on the public markets as well as a couple who are treating Asset Match as a training ground ahead of an IPO. Apologies for the rather long winded post but I just thought it would keep you shareholders in the loop. If you need any help or have questions then please don't hesitate to get in touch. All the best, Ben Weaver
You know what I mean. Most aim fail. Most aim are corrupt. Most pi's who try aim loose.
Nothing wrong with Aim per se. Look at Clinigen ASOS, GVC for just a few examples. It was Osborne who allowed AIM into ISA and quite right too. My GVC has trebled ( in a SIPP) share selection is everything. Main board shares go very wrong too look at Rolls Royce, BP recently etc etc
That's stitch and stitching.
And another aim company sticking up good old honest pi's. Got to wonder how much mr Cameron got paid to allow aim shares to be allowed in isa's. Thank god the plonker has gone.
Hi shylock: Sorry for late reply,,, faze in and out of here as I have written off any value... First direct is my holder. They wrote and told me I can't hold these in my account and so asked for a cert to be issued to me... This arrived yesterday (Saturday).
Hi all, I held my shares as didn't see the point selling, I am with halifax. Before I give them a call to discuss does anyone know what options those who held have? Thanks
Looks like Bob Morton was the buyer of the block of 10.6 million shares that are shown in the Share Trades list link and sold on the afternoon of the 5th July. Don't see how reporting a purchase from July 5th on July 7th is 'late, late'.
No doubt he sees future value in their extensive library of video rendering patents!
My shares disappeared out of my on-line pf so I can't sell them at the last minute if I wanted to.. Paper copy coming via postman pat,I'm told...
Hl doesn't allow me to buy share online. Last day of aim trading.
Well it's certainly been a roller coaster of a ride. Looking forward to going around once again - still got my ticket!
BY the time one Euro worth 's 80 p you and me are well F...T as nothing that we have will worth anything ,...
Maybe cos it will not be de-listed!!! Could be, but I have a feeling there is still life left in here yet. Time will tell.
I agree, Shylock. Surprised at the %'s, but these holders have stuck with the SP as it's dropped and still voted they way they did. That says something to me! I will try to juggle some money to buy more shares before delisting.
It's all liar liar and we sit there like mugs being spoon fed it by the Urban Elite and accepting it because it must be true because they said it was 92% that means only us 4 voted against Bit like this Brexit thing ,they lost get used to it but no they have the cheek to demand another vote because they didn't like the result Quote that sterling is in free fall and all our shares will be junk by the end of the year And even when they are being interviewed saying we need to have another vote shares have rebounded and Stirling is coming back to its comfort zone with a euro being worth 80p Lets be fair it was to high anyway it was damaging our ability to export competitively When Euro traded around 80p that was our best times win win But they must of missed that bit Read somewhere that one person said that the vote should be ignored because people who voted leave where not (equipped) to decide on issues of this magnitude SORRY? Anyway sorry I went off the point But we just accept things because we are told it's true by someone who we think should be believed Ahhhh that's better got rid of all my anger in one hit