Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

BMR Share Chat - RSS Feed

Berkeley Mineral Resources Share Chat (BMR)



Share Price: 1.075Bid: 1.05Ask: 1.15Change: 0.00 (0.00%)No Movement on Berkeley Min.
Spread: 0.10Spread as %: 9.52%Open: 1.075High: 0.00Low: 0.00Yesterday’s Close: 1.075


Share Discussion for Berkeley Min. (BMR)


Thread ViewThread View
Please Login or Register to post messages
Posts per page:


brynjon
Posts: 1,381
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
The website question.
Today 00:45
I wanted to get data stamped question posed to the company should the need arise.

I gave a simple question to answer and it was glossed over. Yes an answer, however, not detailed. They now know at least one investor has asked the question as to whether the information contained on the website is valid or otherwise. Should it not be and it remains, there may be some mileage, though doubtful.

I was certainly not expecting a straightforward answer so I was not perturbed by the response, at least I got one, whether genuinely signed off by AB or not.

Still nothing to be found by means of google and other searches to suggest anything elliptical!!
 
West
Posts: 159
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
Nedd BMR plans
Thu 23:33
I have very little knowledge on Z&L tailings processing, I have been looking at purely human behaviour or should I say how I hope some of the human beings working at BMR should have behaved.

I do agree that a new bod will only want to look at present situation & future, they may look back if money can be recovered, that was to occur, then they are already off on a very good new footing.

The only good reason I saw for a small copper project at Kabwe, was get some local people employed & as long it was profitable, the profit will have off set some of the running costs of BMR. A important undisclosed event was the reason for the scatter gun approach, especially the flurry of copper JVA. The sums of money mentioned as obligation & commitments do not make sense,only if he thought he had firm backer/funding, could he thought it was good
endeavour. If he had the means & a capable team to profitably carry out all the projects,he would have gained a lot of acclaim & deserved it imho.

Thanks again for posting your thoughts.
EricDraven
Posts: 15,986
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
brynjon
Thu 23:27
Thanks for posting the Company's response to your website question Bryn.

Cheers matey.
West
Posts: 159
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
Response from BMR
Thu 22:54
Brynjon

Good effort,not ill thoughts or criticism towards you,but I did not expect very much. One, they have already stated investigation not finished, but some are saying the alleged anomalies is a reason to enable their true plans to be enacted. I understand anybody thinking,we are talking about a investment in a on the ground Z&L tailings, not some
who done it thriller. That is goldfingers doing, sorry MA ,creating so much uncertainty & doubt.

The most simple way of getting valid factual information,that pi can use as a anchor, has to be a rns release stating all known positive & negative factual up to date information. That release whilst suspended would give the long suffering shareholders time to review & revalue their investment. Never mind the nonsense about market & new investors, the BOD are in place to run the company, whilst also taking care of shareholders interest & use their skill to enhance the value of the company.

Shareholders should not be scared to ask for good governance & accountability, very rarely are company BOD held accountable, reason shareholders on their own feel powerless & vulnerable.

BrynJon Your request could have been handled in a more helpful manner by AB,we are suspended,you was not trying to cause problems or gain advantage on you own behalf, they may not be able to release sensitive info. via web site,but could have helped or given reason on why unable to comply. There may be some news already prepared for release via RNS. All that is just waffle,conjecture on my part.

AB, if he wants to start with a cleansed & a properly functioning BOD - company & wants shareholders on board,he needs to show clearly that he & bod will respect & give priority to shareholder interest & rights..
ALL shareholders wants to see that become a reality, shareholders need to act as a group,as a group of 5% or 10% holding, you can start hold BOD &company accountable.

Thanks for posting & attempt to obtain much needed information.
1Laffer
Posts: 156
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
Yep.... Defo still Alive :)
Thu 22:08
Holders : 128
Shares : 148.56 Million
Percent : 11.05

Lets get some questions lined up for Alex and the BoD....

https://bmrwatch.shutterfly.com/
Nedd
Posts: 47
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (2)
RE: BMR plans
Thu 19:36
Westy, I have the greatest respect for your posts. They are perceptive; to the point and ask the right questions.
The problem with the Geoff Casson rns is not the guy himself but MA who made the 'final processing decision' statement.
The peer review - if it's done properly it will be a forensic examination of the DFS. And we must be prepared for a negative sa well as a positive outcome.
It is an assumption - but not an unreasonable one IMO - that there will be a new BOD. If there isn't I would be most surprised.
The focus must be on a simple gravity separation process to produce a saleabke concentrate, That is what I'm looking for and sincerely hope we emerge from the wreckage.
A straigtforward gravity separation is the answer
brynjon
Posts: 1,381
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
Response from office re website
Thu 19:35
The following is the response I received today signed off with AB's details. Not a real response with detail but I am assuming that anything which is incorrect would be removed.

Not saying anything really - below is my original email to them with the response below:-

Hi - as a long time investor in BMR I would like to clarify whether the information shown on the company website remains valid.

I would request merely a simple response that the information is correct or incorrect, and that any misinformation be removed.

I ask this as the company is currently suspended and this information, if deleted, would not impact upon the share price currently.

RESPONSE:-
The Company is required to maintain a website under AIM Rule 26 and the website details are reviewed by the Company and its Advisers on a regular basis.
seismicboy
Posts: 1,323
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (2)
RE: seismic o/t
Thu 18:26
J99 et al, I was only 20 then but remember it like it was yesterday. In your own link about half way down there is the 'plane' that crashed into the stage.
I do remember, surprisingly, the quadrophonic PA which they tested with a vocoder before they came on - completely mind-blowing.
They tested out some new tracks - eg 'Raving and Drooling' which was later released on the Animals album as 'Sheep'
I also saw them at Earls Court in 94, possibly the best live performance of all and on the DVD.
Halcyon days.
Jeremiah99
Posts: 3,039
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (2)
seismic o/t
Thu 17:12
I found this site which documents uk rock festivals and hit on a link for people who were there to post their memories of the event.

http://www.ukrockfestivals.com/75-Knebworth-memoirs.html

I must have been out of it as I can't remember half of what went on. I don't remember the spitfires as the show kicked off but I do remember the surround sound effect of the guitars swirling around us and jumping from side to side - quite novel back then.
Jeremiah99
Posts: 3,039
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (2)
RE: Ahhh! The Hemp
Thu 16:58
And I quickly chided you for advocating the poisoning of the poor pot-heads forced to partake of the toxic weed thereafter - who incidentally would perhaps be wondering why their musical tastes had suddenly turned towards heavy-metal (geddit!) :-)





Sign up for Live Prices


Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.