probably because unlike redeye you and your clones never post anything positive - that is not balance; do you actually understand what balance is?
for me personally your claims and posts lack sense and value and cannot believed - for one thing - why you even bother about a stock of which you don't hold or seem not to want to hold strikes of madness.
however me actually wasting time writing this and bantering with mr speedyhire b7 is equal madness i suppose - such is the boredom at work.
as everyone says, what will be will be. and at the end of the day the drivel that you or I post is not really going to affect how the IIs steer SLE going forward. have a good day.
Thats right Tim. Even redeye is beginning to think there will be no dividends. As he says, the figures just don't add up.
So, talking of balanced posting, why is it that I got put down a few weeks ago for suggesting the same? Why is it that when I suggest the interest in the City is weak and proved so by the new issue price falling from 1.05 to 45p, I get put down.
I have consistently predicted correctly before many, and get insulted for my early predictions only to be mimicked later by those who put me down a few weeks earlier.
The manipulators tell the innocent to check my past posts, I always welcome this as anyone who does will see the accuracy of many, (not all), of my predictions.
For instance the manipulators putting me down when I was selling off tranches of my holding. They were wrong, I was right. Why were they so desperate to bully me at the time?
for information - here is an example of good, balanced posting from redeyemines on iii:
Afternoon Eadwig, thanks for the response, but we may be a little at cross purposes. -I'm not going to dispute the production figs or the projected earnings, they will be what they will be---------------and I hope that all the euphoric forecasts turn out to be true. - -What is worrying me, is how much (if any) of the profit will come directly back to shareholders. - -Putting two and two together and talking to my old contacts in the city, something came to light that changed the minds of the ii's taking up the placing @105p. - -Initially the ii's were falling over themselves to grab a share and I was hearing that the amount of interest being shown was far more than the amount of stock being offered-far more. - -Now suddenly everything has changed, and we have struggled to get the placing away @45p------so what has happened to cause this ? - -The excuse being touted around, is caution on the back of the Brexit Vote,---but that doesn't hold water. - -Interest rates are now virtually Zero, and the ii's are desperately seeking out any stock that provides income--------just look how the FTSE has performed since the vote. - -So my guess is that SLE will not provide the income, that most assumed it would, out of it's vast earnings. - -I believe that having expressed early interest in the placing, the ii's backed away once they were given the full details.-----The RNS stated Dividend and or Share buy back as you rightly pointed out, ----------but now I think that has come down to "and or a Share buy back " and maybe even just a "share buy back". - -That would explain why the ii's now view SLE, not as a solid income stock for which they were prepared to pay 105p, but still as an unproved junior AIMS stock for which they will not pay more than 45p. - -Just my guesswork, and i'll be happy to be proven wrong.
Tim, already done that thanks. Its a well known fact that I cut my losses in this company years ago, kept some shares for educational value, (always easier to follow the story if you are part of the story), and re invested my money elsewhere.
For your info, I regained my money by investing in other Aim oilies, they have not all performed as abysmally as SLE. Perhaps I was just "jammy" lol.
Labouring the point.... anyone is allowed an opinion be they long, short or just watching from the sidelines. If you don't like what they are saying why don't you use the ignore button? I wonder?
What is ILLEGAL however is making up stories to manipulate the SP, for instance if you were part of a pump and dump scheme, bigging up a company with the intent to short it.
Thanks for your concern and investment advise all the same.
labouring the point - if you and your colleagues like frus and sid and deadcat etc dont like the fundamentals then why not move your investment to a company who has fundamentals that you like - there are plenty of IIs and PIs who really do like the fundamentals of SLE and who would be happy to buy your shares upon relisting. Talking jam all the time you clearly do not understand the oil and gas industry - best avoid miners as well as they typically also have a very hard time moving from exploration to production.
Fundamentals,nothing to do with liking or disliking a company though the jam tomorrow forward looking statements are accurate,jam tomorrow,always tomorrow,in the meantime naive investors chase fools gold and the shorters make a living.GL
RNS says that they have received offers at 45p not they have accepted those offers, if someone offers more before re admission docs are published that price goes up. I think that is what the delay has been for. As more ii bid higher to get a piece of the pie the higher the placing price.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.