sloppyjoe, my apologies, I stand corrected on the rise needed to recover from a 20% fall.
However I still feel your claim that implies that I am wrong more often than I am right needs substantiating, You claim was nothing to do with the mathematical mistake I just made but you seem to, opportunistically, be grasping at it to avoid giving earlier examples of my mistakes.
If you are going to continue to call me rude names (childish) and poorly educated (irrelevant) on a public bb then have the courage of your convictions. At least, in future, reply in a civilized manor.
I can not be fairer than this and would like you to be fair also. There is no proper debate if posters resort to insults and name calling in an attempt to win an argument.
Am I a silly boy as you state sloppyjoe? I beg to disagree, with due respect.
for example. 3p - 40% = 1.8p
1.8p + 25% = 2.25p
In fact to get back to 3p from 1.8p you need a 67% rise. (Approx, of course, just in case you want to accuse me of small inconsequential inaccuracies.. It was 8% rise at the time I worked out the figures earlier on this morning).
I was asking you for examples to substantiate your claim from posts previous to the one entitled Sid. Do you have any or is your claim hollow. I am giving you a fair chance to respond to your claim.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.