Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

BMR Share Chat - RSS Feed

Berkeley Mineral Resources Share Chat (BMR)



Share Price: 1.075Bid: 1.05Ask: 1.15Change: 0.00 (0.00%)No Movement on Berkeley Min.
Spread: 0.10Spread as %: 9.52%Open: 0.00High: 0.00Low: 0.00Yesterday’s Close: 1.075


Share Discussion for Berkeley Min. (BMR)


Thread ViewThread View
Please Login or Register to post messages
Posts per page:


brynjon
Posts: 1,340
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (8)
RE: Eric/kluelas
Thu 20:35
laffer - my thoughts re email are not a singular email but a bulk email with the same message in order the company are made aware of the amount of investors unhappy with the status quo.

I am certainly not wishing to be a spoc for this - rather that as investors we all need to make an individual effort to contact the company with their concerns. My only wish is that it is not done without a bit of co-ordination such as the key questions that need to be asked rather than a big bag of generic gripes and moans. It is certainly not a means to undermine your own efforts. I just think it is a quick and easy means to get the message across to the company.
Cheers - Bryn
 
REDORDEAD
Posts: 1,305
Premium Chat Member
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (3)
Laffer
Thu 20:27
Did you get my mail yesterday ? Thanks
1Laffer
Posts: 73
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (8)
RE: Eric/kluelas
Thu 20:25
bryn, a couple of things.......

1. Agree about the EGM, at this point it is gathering who would put their money where their mouth is. Should it get to the serious point of lodging an EGM, I would happily do the organisational bit.

2. Agree about the en-masse email too. You draft the email, I will put it up on the site along with whatever email address you want to use and whatever other instructions you want including a date to send etc.

The site is at : https://bmregm.shutterfly.com/

Drop me a line...........
1Laffer
Posts: 73
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (4)
EGM Pool Update & Correction
Thu 19:56
Folks the current standings are :

Holders : 18
Shares : 23.77 Million

I have had to make a substantial correction due to a typo in a received email. I did challenge in case of a typo and the holder came back with the corrected figure.

Perhaps I will delay updates in future for extremely large holdings, so I can confirm it is not a typo.

Sorry.

For those interested, the site is at : https://bmregm.shutterfly.com/
brynjon
Posts: 1,340
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (8)
RE: Eric/kluelas
Thu 19:36
Foggy - the logistics of sorting out an EGM is quite difficult, more so as it is being done via a faceless and anonymous board. I would not fancy trying to sort it out and hats off to Kiwi for the attempt.

Pitfalls include, anonymity, fibbers, trouble makers to name but a few.

I still await a response to my singular non impactive phone call and follow up email and hence my musings regarding an en-masse email. If they all went at a similar time on the same date, the impact would be greatest.

If there is no response, such as a note to the website answering the salient points as to be decided, then I would be surprised. IMO.
foggy100
Posts: 1,309
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (8)
RE: Eric/kluelas
Thu 19:28
At this rate it would take from now till January to get a proper list of interested parties together and to formulate a proper agenda for it , that is why I think we should be talking about an EGM now.
It will take time to organise , we need to be ready , why wait and try and organise something at the last minute .
Inaction now could lead to over hurried actions later, being prepared and timely is everything
REDORDEAD
Posts: 1,305
Premium Chat Member
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (6)
RE: BMR Future
Thu 19:06
Brynjon, exactly mate they are the two most important questions. Nice and simple.
brynjon
Posts: 1,340
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
View Thread (6)
RE: BMR Future
Thu 19:00
Hi West - I agree with you and I was not trying to suggest you were single minded in your approach.

I do think the company need to speak up - without going to the expense of additional meetings a simple way would be for PI's to submit their questions directly to the company.

I would suggest, (but who am I but a private individual so I cannot force anyone,) is that there is a standard format email to them, probably with the same pertinent questions thereon. That way it would enable a straightforward response to all with the answers they are able to answer, and an explanation re the ones they cannot.

The above is just a thought.

I will start off with a couple of simple questions:-

Is the company still heading towards production of copper, zinc and lead?

Have the previous RNS issued by the company been accurate and are they still accurate?

Simple straight forward and very uncomplicated I believe is the way forward.

Perhaps posters can add to the above and perhaps by the 26th November holders en-masse can email the company. An impactive and quick and easy means to ensure strength of feeling is made known. IMHO of course.
tiny2
Posts: 4,380
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
re spare a thought
Thu 18:47
That could happen here,so spare a thought for BMR holders ,we may be as bad as them .
REDORDEAD
Posts: 1,305
Premium Chat Member
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:1.08
Spare a thought
Thu 18:37
For AMI holders worse than us.



Share Trading BrochureRequest your Free brochures on share dealing, spread betting and CFDs

Sign up for Live Prices
Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.