We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Ok Madpunter and Mathersfinger.
You have both been conned by this video.
I got to the end before I realised I had heard this before.
As I always do on these occasions verify what has been said.
I will cover the main parts then post a proper appraisal.
First the information he gave was not factual from any peer reviewed review.
He tried to manipulate the outcome before looking at the evidence.
Next it is a lie that funding would have been removed if Oxford carried on researching this.
Their was never any funding to research this in the first place, so how can you redraw nothing.
To suggest pharmaceutical companies would withdraw funding for their programs from one of the top universities in the world, would have been determental to the company and the funding would have been filled very easily by pharmaceutical companies that cannot fund Oxford, because Oxford university doesn't have the capacity.
Next he used unsubstantiated data, nothing was checked.
Lastly no medicine is 100% safe.
But fifty times more women die taking the contraceptive pill that through the COVID vaccine.
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/article-by-cardiologist-aseem-malhotra-made-unsupported-claims-about-benefits-risks-covid-19-vaccination/
Can you please take your consipiracy theories somewhere else? I didn't get a PhD to read idiotic ramblings while I try to understand what happened to my investments
HfH,
My guess is that Scott is keeping his power dry for another event. I wonder what that could be? Perhaps he and Bob are keeping some cash ready to buy up the CGP shares they used to own but gave away in the merger for a cheap price which has been enabled by themselves.
157m CGP shares owned by all shareholders about to go back to teh former owners at half the price??
Stinks doesn't it. Well... it stinks if it happens and guess we'll have to wait and see.
Quite frankly, I think insiders should be banned from participating in any purchase of those CGP shares and that they should go (if they need to be sold at all) to a new investor that strengthens the shareholder list... someone like FMG or Barrick would do nicely.
And for the record... I don't think they have enough cash to see out May nevermind June. The June forecast for when cash dried up to zero was made September 2023.
Now... I wonder what newboy Mr Liu is making of all this lol!
This is worth a read on how things can go wrong, so it will not be plane sailing for Cascabel, who ever mines it
https://tinyurl.com/y5u7rrzb
Thanks, Darren. Many of us appreciate your local insights.
Great good play how about an event better copper play thats undervalued!?
Reposting this for any new interested investors:
Obviously focus is currently on the active drilling at the Konkola West license by KoBold Metals. This will test for a deep extension to the ore shale which hosts the recently discovered Mingomba high grade deposit and several operating mines. That's not the only string to the companies bow though. Here's a quick guide to the other Zambian licenses, rather than me typing it, here are some video presentations the company did:
Jacks project: https://x.com/Tertiaryplc/status/1726875006255194188
Mushima North: https://x.com/Tertiaryplc/status/1714543279717363797
Mukai: https://x.com/Tertiaryplc/status/1701903712094929119
These are the licenses that were recently re-negotiated with the local partner to bring them all under the ownership of TYM and make it easier for any potential JV's. All of these licenses are drill ready. The company has previously mentioned that there has been unsolicited JV interest in the licenses from “major mining companies”.
The company also has 100% ownership of the Mupala license which is directly adjacent to the Anglo American / Arc Minerals JV and very close to where Anglo have been drilling.
In addition to the Zambian licenses there is the Storuman fluorspar project in Sweden. The license for this project was cancelled several years ago by the Swedish Mining Inspectorate but last year the Government cancelled the annulment and asked the Inspectorate to reconsider the application. Should this be approved it will certainly have a positive effect on the SP. It's now more than 6 months since this was announced so we could hear something relatively soon.
There are other licenses in USA but they seem to be on the back burner at the moment.
Sorry wrong board
Paul’s ,your the one who stated yesterday that ,JA was not trustworthy , name your sources please.
Why are you still invested?
Your history suggests every share is a disaster that your involved in.
I am positive here after RIG contract news in December and license extension in February and MULTIPLE parties wanting to fund TRP,hence buying in around Feb. My questions to JA about the company are varied and been answered immediately.
You motives here are questionable .Why are you invested here?
There is zero chance cascabel will be producing in 3 years.
But I’m sure multi billion investments are thrashed out in an Ecuadorean coffee shop on a regular basis.
However, perhaps I should ask my daughter’s school friend’s mother who used to be on BHPs board when they took a stake in Solg……..
Madpunter
Science is like accounting, they can get the end result to say what they want you to think.
Personally I don’t believe in all this conspiracy junk.
The world needs to get a grip on the amount of 💩 that gets spread into the public domain and this is a battle that will go on for years as it did with press groups and governments 30-40 years ago.
The younger generation think not working and being paid a fortune for doing/producing nothing is the way forward. Investing in crypto is actually an investment not a Ponzi scheme, Facebook is where you get your news.
It’s a joke. No wonder the world is a mess
And then you have BBG 🤣🤣🤣
Darren. Really mate, I think your starting to believe your fantasy.
Sister friendly with the mayor. At lunch telling her production in 3 years.
It's actually getting more ridiculous than copperpots secret coffee shop banker.
I'm sure you wl get a dozen tick ups. Just shows how absurd this board has become.
Believe anything, if its good news.
Quady,
Here’s the link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvGCtM25fN0
Madpunter you say I need to watch this video but don't post one.
I have seen many videos saying peer review is subject to finance of the science field they are in and if they don't come up with results that are required then funding is withdrawn.
They have all turned out to be false.
Why?
Because peer review stops people making false claims.
It only takes one scientist to disprove a paper and the arguments no longer stand.
But please amuse me
Post the link and I will read it, and show you evidence wherever it stands up to scrutiny or not.
Tks as ever DK.
Quady - You need to watch this video. It not only highlights the major problems with the COVID vaccine, but also the 'dark place that science has gone too.' The two references at the end should enlighten you about your emphasis on 'peer reviewed' research. 'The greater the money and number of research papers, the greater the science is false,' This is from the Stephen Hawking of the Medical l World.
Thank you for the insight Darren. I truly hope that we won't still be here waiting for another 3 years and whomsoever it will be who will build the mine will make their move expeditiously.
Galactus is the devourer of worlds, Scott The Rocks Caldwell is the devourer of dreams!!
Evening all. Just a snippet of info. My sister has lived here longer than I have, about 25 years and she is good friends with the wife of the mayor and the mayor Castillo. She went out for lunch today with the mayors wife. They were talking in general of politics in Ecuador and also province of Imbabura. Nationally the mood is support for Noboa. Provincially she said the mayor is working hard in conjunction with Noboa to progress Cascabel for obvious reasons to benifit the provincia greatly. She said the mine will be built and producing within 3 years. What she didnt say was who would build and finance it. Thats the million dollar question? Nothing we cant assume or summise ourselves but reassuring to hear from people who know more than we do I am sure!
ATB
DK
Hfh.
I wonder how two of your posts tie in with recent share DEALING, and your claim to be 100% correct with your inside info.
Your March post.
"in this case I concur with 1984, it is 100% certain executives are in receipt of materially price sensitive information not in the public domain, so cannot trade. The said price sensitive information relates to various financial offers and will be released in the near future and will have a very positive impact on the SP, in my opinion."
Or your earlier in the year post, that news of a finance deal is imminent.
However, it's good to see some of you are waking up to the fact that solg is a s" "t show, and despite posters wishfully pleading the opposite.
NOTHINGS CHANGED
It's not like you to sound so doubtful HfH!!!
Perhaps a timely email to solg to see if they can shed any light on what exactly is going on. Nothing Scott The Rocks Caldwell does surprise me. In fact, the current confusion is exactly what I expect from an inept buffoon who is trying to punch above his weight.
I regard these buys as clear evidence that there is no bid and that we will be stuck here for the foreseeable with this buffoon gorging himself at the trough. They should not be able to buy if a corporate event was imminent.
"Bye Bye bullying troll, I have reported you directly by email"
What a wimp.
Perhaps you should stop posting on this forum skint as all you seem to do is repeat the same rubbish here about this forum. Besides the garbage you've filled the gst board with today after I caught you out in lies. Then you ran to admin and emailed them complaining of being bullied. Shame you couldn't man up you little cry baby.
I knew there was new pathology concerns with this vaccine, but this link will open your eyes to what has gone on, it’s like a new Horizon case all over again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvGCtM25fN0
Wishing you all well, Atb
I've taken my time whilst trying to make sense of the recent Director share purchases and personally I've come to the conclusion they were absolutely ludicrous.
Firstly you have Scott, who memory serves has about 14.5m in share options, who has already shown his faith buying £91k's worth less than 6 months ago buying just over £5k's worth, despite doing a recent interview saying he couldn't be because he's in a close/blackout period. Then you have Chris, who I understand it has received all the financial offers to shore up the balance sheet, buying not a lot more than Scott, but also having 9 million share options. He must, in my opinion be in a close period due to the fact a financial deal simply must be completed I would guess if not now then next month.
So why did they make such insignificant purchases? Was Scott being disingenuous when saying he couldn't purchase or being disingenuous when saying they would shore up the balance sheet, which let's face it HAS to be done by June.
ANY Director purchase i have seen has always been viewed as a sign of confidence, except these. There was absolutely no point, no need, they are at best disruptive and confusing, at least in my mind.
As for the future despite what others say, I see real progress. Nothing has changed in my view. They will get non dilutive finance to shore up the balance sheet. They will sign the Exploitation Agreement and the IPA and they will continue to derisk Cascabel adding value at every milestone until an acceptable offer comes in, and we'll also get the strategic review detailing what non core assets will be divested, at least in my opinion.
BUT if the above does happen, I can't see any explanation as to why that wouldn't be deemed insider trading. Nothing makes sense as to why they would buy that pultry amount at this particular time. As for a code, really? Next you'll be telling me a purchase of 1 means an RNS is coming lol.
All I can do is wait for an explanation, maybe there's a good one that I'm unaware of??
Rio Tinto Copper Boss Says Building Mines Is Better Than Buying
Ignoring 1984s daily insignificant arrention seeking ramblings. And getting back to solg.
Yesterday's posts have left me undecided.
Do I go along with.
The share buying fiasco, was insider trading.
Or do I go with, there's something going on in the background, but he got special permission to buy, so broke no rules.
Highly unlikely, why go to all that trouble to buy a pittance
It was scotty boys way of sending a secret code.
Or, it's showing scotty boy, has confidence in solg.
If so, why only such a small amount.
Or it will be 120p in 120 days.
289 billion voted for him, only 3 voted against him at the agm, so he must be doing a good job.
At what point do we change our mind.
One fella giving us advice, drives a Bentley, has to £450,000 cheques coming, has more property than Donald trump, and owns 5 billion shares in sol advising us.
You would assume he would be worth taking advice from.
Or do I go by what scoot boy has actually said.
He hopes to keep the lights on.
He would vote for 23p
The fact he only invested his kids pocket money, shows me he's not to confident.
Him buying shares, shows me there is SFA going on in the background.
I can't find one scrap of evidence to support any of the posts telling us, a take over is imminent.
On the contrary, everything tells me we're wallowing, and will be for the foreseeable future.
I think I will maybe look in my cornflake bowl for a day or two., to see any codes scotty boy may send, before I decide.