Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter

EXCLUSIVE: Ascent CEO Colin Hutchinson with latest on review and permitting Watch Here

EXCLUSIVE: Ascent CEO Colin Hutchinson with latest on review and permitting


Nu-oil & Gas Share Chat (NUOG)



Share Price: 0.945Bid: 0.92Ask: 0.97Change: 0.00 (0.00%)No Movement on Nu-oil & Gas
Spread: 0.05Spread as %: 5.43%Open: 0.92High: 0.985Low: 0.915Yesterday’s Close: 0.945


Share Discussion for Nu-oil & Gas


Thread View

Please login or register to post a message on Share Chat.

Posts per page:

pijoe1212
Posts: 5,549
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
Shinystar
Wed 23:54
I have not got seadog banned.
Great English you have
 
ShinyStar
Posts: 16
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
Pijoe1212
Wed 23:36
F--k off- for ****ging off seadog5
Targaryen2
Posts: 13
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Team NUOG - behind the scenes!
Wed 23:23
LT - looking forward to your report back from your Minty meeting.

I’ve been trying to contact Simon for past week and have had no response. It’s all hush hush at NUOG at the moment. Hopefully, because a huge RNS is in the pipeline!
pijoe1212
Posts: 5,549
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
Seadog
Wed 23:06
Not banned again!!!

What for this time? Insults ? Ramping rollocks ? Or market abuse for posting as an insider (abuse) or claiming to be an insider when he was not (abuse)?
Targaryen2
Posts: 13
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:52
*SP not so

Can’t type so late. Ok lights out....
Targaryen2
Posts: 13
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:49
I agree gggg21. I would have thought that you would have to sign some sort of non disclosure document when in talks of a sensitive nature. To prevent so of those companies going into freefall for instance.

Perhaps someone more experienced can explain the process?
gggg21
Posts: 3,800
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:43
But it would have an effect on the other listed companies involved such as aker, dommo etc. hence why it isn’t that easy as they would have to put out an official statement too. In the podcast Simon and Alison very subtly touched this point.
Targaryen2
Posts: 13
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:40
Ben - I’d be happy with 1 for now. Just as proof of concept. Just get it done BOD! Please!
SecretBlueprint
Posts: 363
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:39
Highroller

That is what any self respecting board of directors would do. The question is why they don't.
highroller
Posts: 2,690
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:30
surely the "gossip" of 6 plus is in public domain and many insiders are indirectly confirming the gossip , is it not the company's responsibility to state clearly that they are in talks which may or may not result in XYZ. That will kill all the pond life and more importantly keep an orderly market. This farce of insiders V Pond life has to come to an end and the management/BOD are totally to blame.
BenFOGL
Posts: 2,242
Premium Chat Member
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:30
Seadog was banned for his spat with Norfolk last night, it has nothing to do with being an insider. 6 deals would be nice but I'd be happy with 2 a year
SecretBlueprint
Posts: 363
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:24
I am not an insider so I will tell you.........

An insider called LYATES posted here, but now deleted and banned it seems, that there were 6 deals under review and 1 formal offer made.

I suspect this will get deleted too
highroller
Posts: 2,690
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:19
what is a 6 plus 1 shout? gggg21 you are not an insider. just shout it out.
WOBWAT
Posts: 2,614
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:12
Gggg - I’m only posting stuff people can find on the www just like I did.

It’s 100% findable mostly through regulatory news releases and company statements, trading updates etc,

Wouldn’t want the trolls to have any excuse to claim I’m posting things not in the public domain!
gggg21
Posts: 3,800
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:08
wobwat you absolute star. I now completely get the 6 and 1 shout. Quite speechless at the moment. If this comes off quite simply wow. The nomads aren’t going to allow this chat for much longer my oh my!
WOBWAT
Posts: 2,614
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:07
Targaryen- I’m speaking to Seadog on The phone tomorrow and I’ll find out what’s going on
WOBWAT
Posts: 2,614
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:06
Get a bit more accurate and maybe they will! Lol

I’m pretty certain you posted that it was onshore Brazil and until facts come into play that it isn’t onshore you won’t change your opinion.

It seems you may have found that ‘fact’ to now think it’s offshore no longer onshore?

Honestly not having a dig, just interested to see why you’re now saying offshore?
SecretBlueprint
Posts: 363
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:05
SBP - just for clarification, are you now saying this is offshore Brazil? I’m sure you posted something slightly different previously?
====

As Wedgwood Benn famously said, " If the facts change, I can change my mind"
Targaryen2
Posts: 13
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:04
Wow, SBP. If you are right, then ‘#exciting times’ indeed.

WOBWAT, I will dig into this too. Thanks for all your research guys.

Just to let you know though - according to Twitter - SEADOG was not banned foe being an ‘insider’ ... see for yourself.
SecretBlueprint
Posts: 363
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:03
Thank you WOBWAT

I will keep digging. Maybe they will make me an insider too! But I am twice as old as LT, so it may take some time, LOL
WOBWAT
Posts: 2,614
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 22:01
SBP - just for clarification, are you now saying this is offshore Brazil? I’m sure you posted something slightly different previously?
WOBWAT
Posts: 2,614
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Shark talk
Wed 21:54
Semi accurate post SBP but you missed out a significant amount of detail I found while doing my research which took quite some time. You might want to dig a bit deeper into the finances, the restructuring currently being attempted, the relationship between the bond holders and Dommo, Dommo’s other interests they’re struggling to support financially, the fpso arrangement - these details are all in the public domain and official. Some require translation as they’re in Portuguese. When looking at these you may also want to consider the time constraints they’re under, the money owed to lenders and bad debtors and taxes! Perhaps look at there sp this week, the week Seadog has been made an insider to stop him posting information he’s been trawling through for months!!

#exitingtimes
SecretBlueprint
Posts: 363
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
Shark talk
Wed 21:35
Imagine a world where there was a listed company in Brazil, asset rich, but cash poor and emerging from bankruptcy. It has a market cap of £600 million, but only £20 million in cash. This company operates an underperforming offshore oilfield and needs a step change to restore sustainability, perhaps by drilling more wells in better locations, perhaps by improving productivity of the offshore production facilities but they simply cannot afford to do all that. They don’t have the money.

Along comes a bloke from Manchester and says, I can help if you like. There is this company in UK called MFDevCo (Brazil) Holdings Limited. I am its boss. I can ask my friends in Aker and AGR and elsewhere to take a few shares in MBHL and then reverse into your listed company with all this wealth and expertise and sort you out. They won’t want any money upfront, they will be happy with their revenue share from MBHL when more oil is sold.

Then there is China Pacific where I have another deal going, they are part of COSL y'know. They have 8 harsh environment jack up rig drilling facilities and one idle right now that can operate in your water depth. I am also the boss of MFDevCo (China) Facilities Limited which has a lease option on the rig, and Bank of China will extend non-recourse credit facilities to drill 6 wells, to be repaid from a production royalty.

We only want 49% of your company to do this, but you must hand over duty holder responsibility to us via our friends at Aker. Our due diligence and sub surface assessment tells us that we can increase production threefold. So it is win, win all round.

Anyone fit the bill in this imaginary world? Ah yes, Dommo Energia SA. Funny how their share price rocketed by 110% on the same day as the NUOG Beaufort placing
.
This post will be deleted in 30 minutes

SeaShark5
WOBWAT
Posts: 2,614
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
RE: Lastthrow
Wed 21:31
I’m not surprised Seadog was banned after he mentioned the 6+1. I’m hopeful I’ll talk to him tomorrow and will check th exact reason for his ban.

#excitingtimes!
jester16
Posts: 7,089
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:0.945
Lastthrow
Wed 21:08
Well it must of been a good en because it's certainly wound you up. Armchair warrior I think you'll find it's called a keyboard warrior but I'll let you off.
Seadogs last post 6 plus 1 lyates.
Sierra foxtrot hasta la vista.
2 trading days to go for your ramptastic post last week.




Share Price, Share Chat, Stock Market news at lse.co.uk
FREE Member Services
- Setup a personalised Watchlist and Virtual Portfolio.
- Gain access to LIVE real-time Regulatory News (RNS).
- View more Trades, Directors' Deals, and Broker Ratings.
Share Price, Share Chat, Stock Market news at lse.co.uk






Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.