We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Nanoco Group has been granted a patent for a photodetector with a unique design involving two-dimensional quantum dots (2D QDs) dispersed in charge transport materials. The heterostructure photodetector includes specific materials like zinc, titanium, vanadium, or nickel in the interlayer, offering enhanced performance. A recently granted patent (Publication Number: US11903225B2) discloses a heterostructure photodetector designed with specific layers and materials to enhance its performance. The photodetector includes a first electrode, a first photoabsorbing layer made of a two-dimensional (2D) nanosheets, an interlayer made of a metal oxide with zinc, titanium, vanadium, or nickel, a second photoabsorbing layer made of 2D quantum dots (QDs), and a second electrode. The combination of materials and layers aims to create a built-in electric field for improved functionality. Additionally, the photodetector may include a transition layer between the two photoabsorbing layers, each layer may contain charge transport materials, and the overall thickness of the layers ranges from about 50 nm to 800 nm.
Furthermore, the patent details specific configurations and compositions for the photoabsorbing layers, including the percentage of 2D nanosheets and 2D QDs present in each layer. The patent also mentions the thickness and dimensions of the nanosheets, emphasizing their properties for optimal performance. Additionally, the inclusion of charge transport materials in each layer further enhances the photodetector's capabilities. Overall, the patent highlights a novel design for a heterostructure photodetector that leverages unique materials and layering techniques to improve its efficiency and sensitivity in detecting light.
Change into message view. then it’s easier for you trouble
Re : 15.09 comment.
@charty
Your discussion with Kooba was on the "Sub 20p" thread.
You seem to have croosed over, probably in error but makes things difficult to follow.
But you're right, time is too precious. Let's concentrate on the next RNS, whether Hamoodi has also accepted the tender offer? Apparently nobody wants to talk about it. Another strange thing.
I don't think it's "childish"
But I understand you don't want to talk about it.
But you have time, as we know. You post for hours almost every day on both boards. So that's probably not the problem.
Where's Xenon these days ?
Tweedledum without Tweedledee !
That was of course aimed squarely at charty not you troublesome!
You are such a child ...and my time is too precious to be dealing with childish questions incessantly as much as you like the attention. Post your childish drivel ..its just irrelevant and rather boring.
'There's none so blind as those who will not see '.
Saying that can't find my specs ! - probably lost in the undergrowth - great day today, just wish grass would stop growing.
"Because there are idiots who don't understand ex entitlement adjustment"...
You don't have to call yourself an idiot because you couldn't understand why the price didn't immediately fall to 16-17p after the tender offer, as you assumed. That can happen to anybody. Don't be so hard on yourself Kooba
TGTD
"No doubt LOAM off into the £3m buy back another blinder by them leaving retail investors picking up the tab!"
They have their strategy which I believe is good. They voted for a buy back of shares. I have followed there lead as I also believe the sp will drop in after the buy back is completed, before rising substantially on news.
What tab are you picking up? You are as free to trade as they are. You have even given your view of what will happen using Loam as supporting evidence. So why aren't you doing the same as them instead of continuing with your incessant winging.
It does look like some are starting to cotton on though..even with a reduced number of shares in issue! ..as i said i don’t believe in magic…its just temporary sleight of hand thats all.
TG2D
As I mentioned previously (removed for some reason) if they've got to play in a soap opera, make sure they don't get the worst role. Seems like one of them got the short straw and the director is having to keep them on track.
They'll end up sweeping the stage or have to get measured for a new costume at this rate.
Seems LOAM do ..but they are smart guys.
Because there are idiots who don’t understand ex entitlement adjustment and make it up as they go along is my only explanation…i hope that helps.
So you can't explain it Kooba. Ok I understand.
@Kooba I was clear that I'd sold out before the tender and hoped to buy in below 20.03p, which would give me a lower average. A bit high risk, but I just bought some at 19.39.
I'm back in!
I think charty is broken ..maybe turn off and turn back on again.
Remember when you predicted a sp of 16-17 p straight after tender offer and it didn’t happen and you understand why?
So where is the difference in the valuation Kooba?
Remember when you predicted a sp of 16-17 p straight after tender offer and it didn’t understand why
Sweety ?
The lack of our regular sock puppet friends speaks volumes!
'sell off'
No doubt LOAM off into the £3m buy back another blinder by them leaving retail investors picking up the tab!
Think we will be sub 15p by end May.