jr it certainly seems like being backed into a corner with POO contributing to lack of cashflow along with other factors like operator control, but someone knows that something is GOOD otherwise why buy 250mil of dead end stock, IMHO there is more to all this than meets the eye.
Thomas is a link to Giant which for me neither has contributed much that we know about thus far, but opportunity and motive is in the mix and he's no numpty, also the larger holders Rita and Ron etc would have been hugely diluted by the issue so it will have been well considered,Thomas although a relative newby is now holding one third of Rita's stock for doing not a lot hmmm.
Hargreaves Landsdown (that's us) are the largest nominee account at 8% I wonder what that actually means in terms of information flow if that was to be one large shareholder probably a seat on the BOD.
Burnell ?? gone ? or still a large shareholder at one time he had 16.1 million shares only 1.5% and not a director so no need to declare anything would have been "in the know" also no numpty, and I don't see that lot being sold at a large loss anytime soon.
The 46million debacle what was the real story with that other than to fire Sanlam out the door.
Shimanek did we really spend $175,000 on a duster or save $400,000 by not completing it, the budgeted cost was $700,000, why did we not do Wog first ? Woger appears to have been binned (permits expired).
The potential for the Sympson wells has already been mooted at at circa 100-130 BOED so circa $2m revenue @ $45. lets hope its worth waiting for .
jr " I'm starting to get a bit nervous" LOL we have put our trust in this BOD for long enough now don't waver keep calm and carry on !!! IMHO oh and stay away from the sell button.
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.