Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
On founding the farmers alliance back in the spring the following comment was made:
"McLaughlin said that it is too early to say if the Farmers’ Alliance will run candidates in the next elections but the idea is not being discounted at this stage."
With an election due in the next twelve to fifteen months the possibility is that a proper farmer alliance party with potentially twenty members plus Sinn Fein would easily form a majority.
At that point Varadkar, Martin and Ryan will be for the birds and with a proper Farmer's Alliance seeing the benefit of Barryroe it will definitely be developed. The only issue is that Goodman now holds all the cards for Barryroe with the exception of the 20% Lansdowne owns and the 4.5% nett interest that San Leon owns.
So Larry and the farmers who are his bread and beef will be the beneficiaries except what we can get from Lansdowne.
We have all be scr*wed by Larry. Perhaps he will do the good think and revise the miserable 5% he promised us in his takeover.
It will never happen but I would love the o&g companies to just stop supplying for a while and let them all walk to their next climate knees up.
A spade’s a spade and Ryan’s insanity is insanity - on crusade business-class round the world. Never mind no steel, Varadkar and Martin have no balls at all to let this happen on their watch.
Https://twitter.com/FarmAlliance1/status/1733132316015260125?t=kmgyS0r1YIZN1w-pMOZB3g&s=19
No problem Flashgarden. This is a high pressure share to be in. I haven't worked out the increase in the number of shares myself but I would say you are right. I suppose the good news that is been overlooked a bit is that the company reaffirmed yesterday that they are going to sue the Irish government and they are putting together the legal action that will be announced in due course and that is the reason for the fundraiser and expansion in the number of shares, so the 12% increase in share capital should be easily offset for shareholders once the details of the legal action are announced.
Apologies for yesterday guys - bad day.
Only bit of rns I have an issue with now is the figure of 8%
if after the firm placing we are at 1233m ( 40/1233 = approx 3%) then surely an additional 160m conditional shares takes us to 1393m.
160m new shares will be approx 11.5%
Thank you very much Swizz. You are a Gentleman. Regards
Spud, it is an official date, it is within the scheme of arrangement document that was submitted to the high court and approved by the high court, as part of the confirmation hearing process, I have copied and pasted the two pertinent points from the SOA for you below,..GL S
Plus, the effective date was November 8th and I understand from someone close to the situation, they are a few days behind schedule.
4.16 The Investor will allocate to the Other Shareholders 5% of any net after-tax profits realised by the Company from the Barryroe field either through its sale or operation at any time in the 10 year period after the Effective Date (“the Proposal”).
4.17 For the avoidance of doubt, the Other Shareholders shall not be required to commit additional funds to participate in the Proposal. The documentation giving effect the Proposal will be prepared and distributed to Other Shareholders within 30 working days of the Effective Date.
One Question Swizz. I have seen a 30 day period mentioned for the SOA for Barryroe Energey. Cannot find it mentioned anywhere in any document. Is this an offical date or one that can be moved and will be delayed as per the minor procedural delays. Just wondering when we might expect to see some news - rough idea !!!
Thanks very much Swizz. It seems that at least there is fair play and general respect for the smaller shareholders here. BOE/Providence was a nightmare. Will be interesting to see the forthcoming news. Take care
Do not see any dillution apart from the new shares that will be issued
Total Voting Rights
Following admission of the Firm Placing Shares, the Company will have in issue 1,233,618,337 ordinary shares of 0.1 pence each. No ordinary shares are held in treasury. Therefore, the total number of voting rights in the Company will be 1,233,618,337.
No ordinary shares are held in treasury. Therefore, the total number of voting rights in the Company will be 1,233,618,337.
The above total current voting rights number is the figure which may be used by shareholders as the denominator for the calculation by which they will determine if they are required to notify their interest in, or a change to their interest in the Company under the FCA's Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules.
Another LG-style mugging? I think Swizz has got this right. Maybe you are praying he has got it right! LG’s moves in the business world are enough to make a lot of people paranoid but LOGP has to plan for all eventualities and not be caught out unable to raise cash, with LG hovering in the background ready to hoover up any further tasty morsels that become easy prey.
So in a glass half empty perspective my opinion is that my holding is being devalued by 90%
My opinion is that the defferred shares are going to get wiped at some point.
Spud, I would suggest Lansdowne are being very strategic with the content of their comm's, not having a meeting is not an indicator, that discussions are progressing, plus it is vitally important that the litigation/compensation pathway remains very robust,
Today's comm's are predominantly dominated by wording and process to satisfy the Nomad and Aim regulations, due to the capital reorganisation, I also understand that there are some minor procedural delays with BOE and I am sure we will gain a much greater understanding of the future plan, when all of the key aspects of the SOA are squared away,
The positive from today, is that without exception all of the key stakeholders of Lansdowne are unified and supportive, myself included, I would also add, that the Irish Times article posted below is digested by anyone with any interest in the project, ..GL S
I know it says the conditional shares represent 8% but is that the case?
At present c1.2b shares at c0.1p
on 12th dec c1.24b shares at c0.1p
On 29th dec this becomes c1.24b shares at 0.01p and the deferred shares can be wiped out so are essentially worthless.
So does that not really equate to 124m shares at 0.1p
Hello Mamms. Agree with you. Let us hope that things will speed up once Vevan issue there new plan for Barryroe Energy. Perhaps that has been delaying things. It is the only reason I can see for not having instigated procedings to date.
FFS. Why are expenses so high? They are issuing 200m new shares every 6 months (plus warrants etc), how long will that continue? We had 1bn shares in issues, then 1.2bn soon to be 1.4bn (has anyone any idea what the level of warrants that will be converted are if there was ever a settlement?). Seems to me that Boldy and co. need to either settle soon or else pass it over to a 'no foal no fee' legal firm that goes after compensation.
So it appears that nobody from the Decc or the Government has shown any willingness to discuss anything. This should provide more ammo for a legal case. What is yoyr opinion Swizz ?. What are you exoecting regarding Vevan and any potential dealings with Logp ?
Dividing each share into two is just a way of raising new capital if needed as they are technically unable to raise anymore capital using the existing share capital
The Directors of the Company independent from the LC Loan Agreement Extension and Warrant Amendments, being the full Board, consider, having consulted with the Company's Nominated Adviser, SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP, that the proposed terms of the LC Loan Agreement Extension and Warrant Amendments are fair and reasonable insofar as the Company's Shareholders are concerned.
You are not reading it right, as per the RNS it is a reorganisation to reduce the nominal value of the new ordinary shares,..
"effected by each Ordinary Share being sub-divided and converted into one New Ordinary Share of £0.0001 and one Deferred Share of £0.0009. The New Ordinary Shares will continue to carry the same rights as are attached to the Ordinary Shares."
All of the value will be retained in the new ordinary shares,..GL S
90% of holding to be converted to deferred shares which can be wiped out at the companies discretion????
LC on 41m warrants which I assume will be converted into ordinary shares once the total nunber of shares is essentially a tenth of what it is now.
Am I reading this right????
Is it true or not that LG would stand to gain a larger tax concession against future profits at Barryroe if he took over LOGP? If it is true, then he would be keener to buy out LOGP shareholders, it seems to me, and so make the purchase all the cheaper for him and heirs in the long run.
Remind me to engage you to write my obituary when the time comes! While I'm in the land of the living I'm slightly concerned about the consequences of LOGP de-listing. I am determined to remain a shareholder but I can envisage de-listed shares being evicted from my ISA at a lower price than I paid so I will then face CGT from that point.
I can't be the only investor facing that prospect so a takeover offer before de-listing would be very welcome!