We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Yes, yes, multiple accounts, paid for trolls. There are 5 or 6 of us working for Tom.
There I've gone and admitted it now.
To think that's the level you have stoop to to persuade yourselves that you're in the right.
Sheppy still finds time to be miserable on his (fantasy) holiday in the Maldives.
Thorno. You have multiple amounts
So you’re response is total c ra p
I was agreeing with you until you said ‘discuss views with reason’. Does that include discussing your own views with a separate login that’s also you?
You see you’ve lost all credibility you might have had, and it’s unrecoverable.
Because predicting what a share price is likely to do (and calling it right) tends to allow you to either make money or not to loose it -which amounts to the same thing?
Or is that not the point.
You can like the company and what it's doing but choose to not invest in it until you feel that the time is right.
Discussing views with reasoning allows posters access to a range of views that they can choose to consider to guide their action: agree, ignore, green bin or hurl abuse.
Why be negative and talk a share down ? That you’re part of ?
watching you are simply stupid. why cannot other people have a view which doesn’t match yours?
people can post on here as often as they bloody well like just like you do. and for what it’s worth you talk **** must of the time
Bella, ….good comments if you don’t mind me saying so.
To add ( as pointed out) the stage we’re at isn’t fully watertight yet. However in DD terms Affimer conjugates are atypical and might be therefore attributed a lesser risk.
Positively there are several Av comms referencing deals ,so with a ‘ completing ‘ study point coming near term chances are potentially +?
At the same time AS has been with this for a decade plus , so to loose ( poor term takeover ) now would be a kick. Don’t believe that’s on the cards having seen the mettle of this chap first hand.
There are examples 23/24 of takeovers at this stage of $1-2bn , so with a ‘platform vehicle ‘rather than a drug set ,you never know.
All to 0lay for…
GLA
Saddo
Counting yourself there Watching?
How apt.
Three clowns in a row. Or is it the same person!
He's the resident 'Clown Spotter.'
Invaluable input.
Watching you are on here more than him
Winne it’s about time you come clean. Who do you work for? Nobody would spend the time you do on here otherwise
TA, Already posted that 41p was the likely target when the SP was above 51p
Sentiment...yes...the markets are not convinced yet...they like to see profits or the sniff of same.
So far we are only in P1 trials...not quite good enough for the markets...they want to see FDA approval.
DX...too much background debt right now...they want to see more upswing in income v debt and like many PI's the true synergy has not really been explained/realised. New products containing affimers flying off the shelves might just do the trick.
Hey ho...not long to go...
Icecool...'FDA approved oncology drugs are worth a fortune, many multiples of our current mkt cap alone. Exciting summer ahead imo.'...
Yep and June/July is where the starting line will be drawn...
In the meantime we have Prelims to look forward to...last year was 25 April...so next week we should have at least two RNS's ...Prelims and Qrtly issue of Equity/Cash...go on Avacta put the cat amonsgt them and splash the cash this time...
Now was AS talking about the Closed Period when he said he couldn't discuss non-AVA6000 matters or was he referring to a News blackout connected to the REX offering...either way, there could be some more sweetners to come within the Prelims notes...
The conversions havent had any impact on the share price in the past. It is a known even and must be baked in. We have our cash runway to commercialisation and no more road blocks to realise the massive value here. I was invested in SAR @11p and got out way too early. Wont make the same mistake here, pharma is going ballistic with huge M&A deals. We are a sitting duck for a US player looking to pick up UK business on the cheap. i wouldnt want a takeover at this stage but an offer would certainly help to stablise the share price.
Most of here , I think , are here for the Cancer Platforms. I have never really understood the Build and grow strategy for the Diagnostic business. Probably a " My bad" moment and me not understanding the synergy value in the science across the 2 arms of the business.
That said given that we have the Diagnostics Business which I assume could be easily divested or just seperately listed. Does anyone have a feeling for the value of the Diagnostics part of the busines after the most recent bolt on purchases.
Given the Mkt Cap now languishes at 168m what proportion that is covere by the Diagnostics division ?
Any Thoughts ?
Correct, if they have already opened at 55p and look to close around 45p (presupposing this is the HC sell floor), then yes, they absorb 1.7m of those shares.
So someone opening a short position expecting a significant fall in the share price and you're saying that this is a good thing because when they close it it'll put upward pressure on the share price.
Hmm.
Well yes, the volumes traded per day could go up or down, adjust the scenario to suit your predilection.
As for TA, you could ask wyn for a 10 hour session when he next pops in for a cup of tea 👍
I first invested here in 2019/20 when the sp was just 13p & it was solely on the back of the science and nothing has changed , but regarding the above thread I’d just like to say that that is just your interpretation of what AS has said . My own view is that in the first part of that quote .. he’s saying he’s got clear irrefutable evidence that the platform works & he has ,so whilst I accept a lot more irrefutable evidence would add a lot more substance to the cause , it could be argued he thinks the existing evidence is more than sufficient to at least be able to speak to BP about doing a deal . He then follows that by saying the 2nd key element is having a sufficiently long cash runway ….which he actually states that we have now got …
So based on that I think he would be pretty much ready to do a deal with BP at any time provided it was the right deal & a deal that suited both parties & for all we know ….that could be on the cards as I type ,just as much as thinking it isn’t going to happen anytime soon .
He then goes on to explain why he’s not interested in doing smaller deals as it’s highly likely it would potentially cut across a number of key drivers which may in turn prevent BP from bidding & I get that big time why would they want anyone else involved when obtaining a slice of the paradigm shift in cancer therapy ..cos I know I wouldn’t …
What is pretty clear however, is that Avacta’s main objective is to seek a deep pocketed partner who in turn has made it plainly apparent they don’t want a sloppy seconds portion …no they want to be the big cheese & why wouldn’t they .. it’s a no brainer
Point being this of course is just my opinion & I could be totally wrong but so could the opposite view but thats why a range of views is important on a BB some u agree with some u don’t …but that’s why we all pay our money and we all take our chances just as it should be .
I’ve been here nearly 5years now & it’s been a long wait & I get totally all the frustrations of everyone on this board but after that last lot of data and with continuing signs of progress all the signs are signalling we are still on the right path but also having been in 4d which ended up being an absolute shxx show there is imho a case not to be totally blind sided in your own pov . Anyway GLA & exciting times await hopefully .
Predicting an outcome is only as accurate as the information being analysed. Nuff said.
Bring back technical analysis at least that has a basis in statistics 🤣